[ietf-privacy] OTP like Protocol
F_against <f_against@protonmail.com> Thu, 05 April 2018 08:19 UTC
Return-Path: <f_against@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B68126DC2 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 01:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q6LpXo035YVh for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 01:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail4.protonmail.ch (mail4.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577E1120725 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 01:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 04:18:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1522916336; bh=ir9V1GH/JHK7dVEvrwg6BzDbP3sSJ8Tx+cI6dXin8ho=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Feedback-ID:From; b=W7vUnwrHLRqqJo6YP5rXBCZ9pI8tU3Ff+FwaxLgq1V1INbuUdwS4i6ssUVgu8nXi+ Ev1HJI4kPpDxF3g6CxCmu5Loe4MyrDOyT4gTFLGaMDtdgz1TOR8BJhxS0LxwyRkhC7 yTxJtBzsyN3I7+RBzjnYNArGQgYd7wpxQkZorLaE=
To: "mineconom@economy.gov.ru" <mineconom@economy.gov.ru>
From: F_against <f_against@protonmail.com>
Cc: "deleuze@gmx.net" <deleuze@gmx.net>, "ietf-privacy@ietf.org" <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
Reply-To: F_against <f_against@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <oBCR5gSqlNzNoYxOwBnywLNcAF3kp2YoAqt0TN0gJRU6tlQhaNXPSu7tmoci5eq0KMdUoZX9C1bEygeKf297TnMNM0fwQoVMTlSyifb6lew=@protonmail.com>
Feedback-ID: k56xQq7_TYsnTMoUxbfBMmJtguUP1KkoQupyqZ8Bsq2d0y8N8qccnJzvAV9Q8xV4JeRm5gAaQ7vGTrHjZ4vDfQ==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_28d30b75fe267ca24bd8a9444e09f380"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/VZrRnh11tzegjJAM2mohpAkJC3k>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:17:36 -0700
Subject: [ietf-privacy] OTP like Protocol
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:19:01 -0000
Hello Everyone, I want to talk about protocol that has similar characteristics to otp. Are you interessted? I sent to mil.ru, but I am unsure, whether they want to talk about it. Greetings F. Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
- [ietf-privacy] OTP like Protocol F_against