Re: [ietf-privacy] Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 16 June 2014 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B881B2B78 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WXY5S8hFYAuk for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CED1B28B8 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.133.158]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5G810Cn004077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1402905674; x=1402992074; bh=Uyuq4t2NlIm3TSN5mUt9RGa8IAmuKrcpUWj1+yZ5aVo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=dFA2fRNjiHhLsdUarxSQUvWw+F1kLS4pH1duG/BQ79nKHWls/J+MF3QizMpmHwoeQ /FVIUc0Oqwir0DAD2TD5VMUCoD/n2bxFt/iUKW2c+0LMLpHsUeVbiphZRMTJmstA1K D1aPhJhx9yYYjMqYscZy2XnklA6UFmLDJlFfh9Vw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1402905674; x=1402992074; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Uyuq4t2NlIm3TSN5mUt9RGa8IAmuKrcpUWj1+yZ5aVo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=oGI9Uy6VPjGyuYgvduj3C8rhgq0GCqsSPg+gGF+TsWaLfZ/o39TQnXQw6clljSprt jBE1VeXGAxyYXzNJt/dpJ8fcO0PA/EXblw8UNGs0AIcql3aOHLjmRqsUgH8QQcsLg8 yS9kSlQMl1dm+Z56ugY+IcNL1SKZS20I9zKCIVOU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140616002159.0b5fc3d0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:52:15 -0700
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Linus Nordberg <linus@nordberg.se>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <539E3ED5.7090705@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140605221300.0d300d58@elandnews.com> <87d2eaz7x2.fsf@nordberg.se> <539D96ED.2060901@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20140615110808.0bb44ef8@elandnews.com> <539E3ED5.7090705@cs.tcd.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/VbvddJFhgiMmst06XnHGXfPOG4g
Cc: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:01:21 -0000

Hi Stephen,
At 17:48 15-06-2014, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>So I'd say give it a whirl if you've the energy to write an I-D and
>fwiw I'll try push forward with good work regardless of how its
>locally received in one or another IETF WG (no matter the relevant
>WG is an area-wg). But, equally, I'm not interested in helping with
>work on things that haven't even tried to be run by the best list
>of relevant/interested folks. I do get that that's not a very clear
>distinction (sorry:-) but I hope it helps, and regardless am happy
>to chat more, on and/or off list.

I understood the explanation and I am okay with it.  I'll post a 
message to INTAREA.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy