Re: [ietf-privacy] Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 15 June 2014 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F091B2845 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 05:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y66tmkGFja0s for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 05:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B121B284A for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 05:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36884BF10; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:51:59 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Te1NoF1KzrPE; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:51:57 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.12] (unknown [86.45.62.64]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5477BF0D; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:51:57 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <539D96ED.2060901@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:51:57 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Linus Nordberg <linus@nordberg.se>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140605221300.0d300d58@elandnews.com> <87d2eaz7x2.fsf@nordberg.se>
In-Reply-To: <87d2eaz7x2.fsf@nordberg.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/Xy0SZvTH_iU9ktlGyp8SpJZNDdQ
Cc: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 12:52:02 -0000

Hi SM, Linus,

On 15/06/14 13:14, Linus Nordberg wrote:
> S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote
> Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:39:53 -0700:
> 
> | I suggest that the BCP be reconsidered given the lack of privacy
> | considerations.
> 
> +1

Q: How will that happen?
A: Someone will need to write an I-D:-)

If someone does such an I-D that is reasonable and improves
privacy, I'll be happy to help that progress.

Not sure if the BCP's RFC would need replacing or if updating
the BCP with a 2nd RFC would be right myself, so talking to
the original authors and/or the intarea list would seem wise.
They might also have other stuff they'd like to revise, who
knows. (The draft leading to this BCP [1] was an intarea [2]
draft.)

S.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6302/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/intarea/



> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-privacy mailing list
> ietf-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
> 
>