IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-privacy] Status?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 07 May 2014 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939081A06A0 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 01:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZduY44FABCM for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 May 2014 01:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0AC1A0698 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2014 01:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E2AA2802B8; Wed, 7 May 2014 10:59:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193A5280231; Wed, 7 May 2014 10:59:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9EBB38039; Wed, 7 May 2014 10:58:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 10:58:42 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Message-ID: <20140507085842.GA19753@nic.fr>
References: <5367CDC1.40200@gmx.net> <CAPv4CP_F3=PGy9ivQ3Azw+eVjYBOxLH9-hm6Gr-C+L-cfkAEtw@mail.gmail.com> <5367E6E6.3080009@acm.org> <5367EC39.6050304@acm.org> <013e01cf68e7$9f1d5ef0$dd581cd0$@huitema.net> <CAPv4CP_RPAPXetPPkV0FZSm8UFH=D7SsjCVsZgGi+OzpoMXNsQ@mail.gmail.com> <5368DB29.6070506@acm.org> <20140506130309.GA582@nic.fr> <FC7E20F3-D3C4-4C26-8486-6506634B19E7@apple.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <FC7E20F3-D3C4-4C26-8486-6506634B19E7@apple.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux jessie/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/ambYPtYblfu5A5yREPPg1Fwfqzg
Cc: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] Status?
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 08:59:23 -0000

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:03:55AM -0700,
 David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote 
 a message of 28 lines which said:

> that would be good information on its status page, wouldn’t it?

I don't understand. Which status page?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email