Re: [ietf-privacy] protocol discussion

David Lloyd-Jones <david.lloydjones@gmail.com> Wed, 04 April 2018 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <david.lloydjones@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90DC124E15 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 02:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iG7efRF5sJb4 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 02:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA59126DEE for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 02:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id o4so25632668iod.3 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 02:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IM53O+6m0NADBdonwHCJr2DVkQCrRMyxSXmg/YbQ9CA=; b=VLA/WBZW+uqkFyOvbQ5U+Q7bMcvnm5LiNIEiXmlNXb1EyJypcUXqnHLOZVJtUkEFsD yrhOPxVmKAcuKQF0JHf47BY6OYeRjn57o4lvNMH1VYiJOA+PekuBRtmDjQItB4FIrR5Y X/w+IvqEvqnEjcMqhb/uosjm3kIvwsMBZloAt9jI76rUTs/luM2jgTKiXZH7bOE0uu0M +ZZ1uolE32sJPd1XAti/vpCszq0iyAzx9EuBBBEV4Dirck8r12Y9UWf9ytdZBEw/jtWr Soxho7aJ9uAHg3Vp9f2xnodxE3LXvlx66YmL3CU5Zr/FOkCm0DhlfbiePIlqFHf6DaGb zAHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IM53O+6m0NADBdonwHCJr2DVkQCrRMyxSXmg/YbQ9CA=; b=nesidqBhajSR25Fd9/tQESouui9Mcq5ZV7WaHdS6cabAj70epuCTX8M588/wAmR16I xc+h7wVWdpgV0h9luggSGfzHIyZPHIjvmozU4KATbxONNI9qufefL9iTcayRX9r217zK SgX8qxYJD2kIJc33wbpdMoh+BkFWhuIuoEivkhy1dsQYoHWObnTEaeIEMjO7J1oVDIip 31XADvY76+0v4XURhaMHF+ykPZ5hgroDuz3UYlnxqv45bBu6X/j49cqCpX0Hjbbmq9up sp2nNa2XPoyPDJrRYfrsx9hKRQbQFGOUZwxGUeyfCuZ0EIUPjlMSiIr3nZDMhZeVSHg9 OexQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCKgB7vw+rFzO8RS65LodMGPrqR8nXz+D8cMSoBHSYQ+9T/AZF8 Jn9akjKree/8JiKWKImb3xAovy0bcJMXn5x2eOc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49Sdgqj0JAJ9ElVCP1kpOQoOL1dKWQeV5d/59aXMXx+VP+Uyzv/YIiUPIW0IxFxw6yUqlJ128ZfK8NhVuXeSJg=
X-Received: by 10.107.173.102 with SMTP id w99mr15924522ioe.13.1522835979543; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 02:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.142.142 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 02:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3MAQ6M1tPggPvHftmQw7aTiWFOtqKife0JD9XL884XYpcJsybJHf144FOhmbl4piOji6qyxVsvgo2D_mQbrQBUKsSZrH3uY4VwQBM-FoHSw=@protonmail.com>
References: <3MAQ6M1tPggPvHftmQw7aTiWFOtqKife0JD9XL884XYpcJsybJHf144FOhmbl4piOji6qyxVsvgo2D_mQbrQBUKsSZrH3uY4VwQBM-FoHSw=@protonmail.com>
From: David Lloyd-Jones <david.lloydjones@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 05:58:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG-id0asDC8Xbes9rrCfD-18p3qxoXX9oxQRNL5aEkcHOr9ScQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: F_against <f_against@protonmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-privacy@ietf.org" <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144a3089ca8f6056902e1fa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/gAQ4d5-a_gjjJtbFwwlecazOS9Y>
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] protocol discussion
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:59:42 -0000

Um, I think you need to get a handle on how the comma works and how its
working affects meaning.  The ancient usage of the comma in the Second
Amendment of the US Constitution is a good example of the trouble one can
get into with misplaced commas.

Your odd use of the comma in your message suggests that you are not yet
ready to take on the sometimes crucial topic of protocols, anonymous F.

Sorry 'bout 'dat, but frankness is sometimes the best policy.

Best wishes,
-dlj.

On 3 April 2018 at 15:32, F_against <f_against@protonmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> I want to talk about protocol, that has similar characteristics to otp.
> Are you interessted?
>
> Greetings
> F.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-privacy mailing list
> ietf-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
>
>