IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-privacy] old RFC reviews - please try this...

"Christian Huitema" <huitema@huitema.net> Wed, 21 May 2014 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA671A0346 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1e5aKyON1sbe for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xsmtp05.mail2web.com (xsmtp05.mail2web.com [168.144.250.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E34D1A0879 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.2.15] (helo=xmail05.myhosting.com) by xsmtp05.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1WnA6I-0008QN-ON for ietf-privacy@ietf.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 13:17:46 -0400
Received: (qmail 26957 invoked from network); 21 May 2014 17:14:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO HUITEMA5) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[72.235.170.205]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail05.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; 21 May 2014 17:14:45 -0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
To: 'Scott Brim' <scott.brim@gmail.com>, 'Joseph Lorenzo Hall' <joe@cdt.org>
References: <537B1F16.9070801@cs.tcd.ie> <537CC6FE.3010207@cdt.org> <CAPv4CP8xSqNjTeS5TV6Xx1AnqLdUB-AvKDbb4i9m8+rRF3rK5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPv4CP8xSqNjTeS5TV6Xx1AnqLdUB-AvKDbb4i9m8+rRF3rK5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:14:43 -0700
Message-ID: <027401cf7518$29cd77b0$7d686710$@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQD7tVSLbSphvAxeTF5sXW0LBYm/NgIMk6NQAXF+Mzic1tRJ4A==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/tfRTLakEAsOqQOcPlAzoag9p05Y
Cc: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] old RFC reviews - please try this...
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 17:17:51 -0000

>> So, is there a quick rubric for RFCs to review that might be
>> particularly useful? E.g., should we focus on more recent ones?
>
> :-)
>
> Not necessarily recent, but essential, like TCP and DNS. 

My preference: go to the RFC index and check for RFC that are on the
standard track (status set to proposed, draft or standard) and that are not
obsoleted by another RFC.

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email