IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-privacy] [Int-area] NAT Reveal / Host Identifiers

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 06 June 2014 10:48 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5171A0151; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNzu40ADjS5x; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4FC1A0132; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBB51B82AF; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FBC190064; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (174.62.147.182) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:48:25 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300141B4@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 06:48:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <8A4C0802-DE9A-4ADF-AEA5-61DEC2AFB25B@nominum.com>
References: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF628724B2C@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <539016BE.3070008@gmx.net> <53906711.5070406@cs.tcd.ie> <5390D2F8.6000801@gmail.com> <1B87ABE4-1CA1-450D-BA96-3018DF39F08D@nominum.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300141B4@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
X-Originating-IP: [174.62.147.182]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/xOrgeVgEbXxRVoosyaQ4BPXsWO8
Cc: "ietf-privacy@ietf.org" <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] [Int-area] NAT Reveal / Host Identifiers
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:48:39 -0000

On Jun 6, 2014, at 4:11 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> Adding a discussion on potential misuses can be considered to address the comment from Stephen if those are not redundant with the text already in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6967#section-3.  

The document hasn't been adopted yet, so we can avoid security issues simply by not adopting it.   Talking about what the security considerations section might do to ameliorate the harm isn't in scope yet.   First we need to decide whether there is more harm than good done by adopting and publishing the document!

v2.2.0 | Report a Bug | By Email