Re: [ietf-privacy] Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 17 June 2014 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4291A0111 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZui8a50UEFD for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5091A0340 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.146.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5HHUhur021278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1403026254; x=1403112654; bh=evvxl27VnNZtJy7t+PSa5as7tV7S9RTaVR2OaeR38vg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=DFV0Dgl0BveKulibZ9rsewc9Ci+UtkN2uF8FsciV4EL3unMH45JojeRD9vu+XpCQZ NgIfSDxhED2OZr92aoBlktbXciP60P6nDYC5jbU7iU/jLcOHwdl0Ka8AUZL4ygBMLS RxoRxHBoarKoBcynVRrK2YK2WzxmhzRcPREVVVx4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1403026254; x=1403112654; i=@elandsys.com; bh=evvxl27VnNZtJy7t+PSa5as7tV7S9RTaVR2OaeR38vg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=bq1i//Z90VqS6SWrOX7nAxyTARgJfhUW1mtFVaDbvQOTz52r6fDyPPoSiW1H8uLQC XhIdnbgT/7O0oVvp3+0DWKU0gkP3Zm9luq5BmeonZBpyE5BFVqtp+9y7AYINRR8ple k2d+teJ60SfDxU/LOMPa0G0gYUIhMOnsz9RJlkB0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140617094116.0b82a330@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:02:24 -0700
To: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <539E3ED5.7090705@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140605221300.0d300d58@elandnews.com> <87d2eaz7x2.fsf@nordberg.se> <539D96ED.2060901@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20140615110808.0bb44ef8@elandnews.com> <539E3ED5.7090705@cs.tcd.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/z4_nn6jHgUXlRsxOjJj9dNS2q5E
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:31:18 -0000

Hello,
At 17:48 15-06-2014, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>Who knows? I would agree that the intarea is probably not a hotbed
>of privacy activists. But its also equally true that folks on that
>list are probably as clueful as here, and so may well have quite a
>good appreciation of how privacy is more important than previously.

I am picking up the above for a general comment.  Currently, there 
isn't any IETF guidance about privacy.  A person may have a good 
appreciation of how privacy is more important than 
previously.  However, it may be difficult for the person to document 
the considerations in words which the IETF would find acceptable.

There is a message at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/current/msg03948.html 
which highlights the other considerations which can have an impact on 
privacy.  I would like to encourage anyone interested in privacy to 
comment about the topic on the INTAREA mailing list ( 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area ).

Regards,
S. Moonesamy