Re: [83attendees] white dots interim meeting

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-sailors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-sailors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057A421F8AAB; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.231, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkbH4--IRsPe; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F366F21F8AA7; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.75,337,1330934400"; d="p7s'?scan'208,217"; a="637157175"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 29 Mar 2012 05:45:25 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.239]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q2TCjOvm009339; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.6.168]) by vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:45:18 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: [83attendees] white dots interim meeting
Thread-Topic: [83attendees] white dots interim meeting
Thread-Index: AQHNDadW4VqdHJYmdECSZFWbFW9QZJaBraYA
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:45:17 +0000
Message-ID: <87AE312E-81AE-4DC4-8A58-97691B21BC19@netapp.com>
References: <4F745569.6090908@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F745569.6090908@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.116]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8C823C00-5727-4758-AE2D-2CBBB1E60B49"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ietf-sailors@ietf.org" <ietf-sailors@ietf.org>, IETF 83 Attendees <83attendees@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-sailors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list to plan sailing events collocated with IETF meetings." <ietf-sailors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-sailors>, <mailto:ietf-sailors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-sailors>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-sailors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-sailors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-sailors>, <mailto:ietf-sailors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:45:27 -0000

On Mar 29, 2012, at 14:28, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Indeed, if there is a lot of interest in general for skiing in future IETFs I could even create a mailing list a la what ietf-sailors and other similar setups have done. 

Which reminds me to ask if someone is local to Vancouver who could set up some sailing activity there in July?

Lars