Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 22 July 2020 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D95E3A046D for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2hm4JtPAqA7b for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC9853A00E4 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 06MINKnB022865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:23:20 -0700
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <20200721201938.D4F7D1D5CAD3@ary.qy> <1c062b54-db66-9dd5-a2e2-d46366af9428@dcrocker.net> <3A71460E41D39FC6D9A1F873@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <cdd98a73-9c9f-89f4-49e2-2be643a5073f@dcrocker.net> <11DDEF46-EB45-4D4F-88EF-7B543A836EEA@episteme.net>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <c486b6fa-7bbd-d00b-58b3-b49757269f02@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:20:42 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <11DDEF46-EB45-4D4F-88EF-7B543A836EEA@episteme.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/B79mlVD4DmCpm3-OhHQ8ugndxdo>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] broken signatures, was Curious
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:20:56 -0000

On 7/22/2020 11:11 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> a document giving a description of how the protocol pieces are used 
> together in the real world, with a bit of operational guidance and some 
> solid terminology.

Not offered as satisfying what's needed for the current effort, but 
wondering about the, ummm... applicability... of this approach:

    https://bbiw.net/clusters/#suitemail

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net