Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response for Detected Spam"
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 31 March 2022 01:08 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6503A0BDF for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FeFkb9pH31H4 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cross.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (cross.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1351F3A0BD3 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8935607D1; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:08:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout1.hostinger.io (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1AD60560E21; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:08:41 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1648688921; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=yzwqprvjcRz2X+V7NDBgA2A5w9Vb8ZuPcVzZR3DG1DlkfcxHs1MBAuSzAyP00W7Kr0SRod E84Ebt9sE5kYAqDRaKfDtAfSXEERKfaS/aqFdXt//lFNXXYdyjoARomZM6BccBSFWLIg9I +suyAlkyb00YtbS5UTo/FfhAbSkXETBuYXhIBpuIPUHt2b4LoodYiB7ESoGaSc6VeUkA5Z Krb6Mr5hHbEuXyeDeT2tFYeaGnLbS9gPbF5aK43xP8gcFObWD/LpLiroHaY8p6UoP+F0O2 hqDjBjAhzlQJN6f8fZFgTPMHUZnIVTBoqpBPkIKnI74VSguuNsN1vyf9lC6rmQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1648688921; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=Eztbj/WDQr0SgKjYFfvphwgKh3/Hp+AjYKYjSyKYOeA=; b=7oVVy9wi/s8RylaK+0Qo6U1BE+e9/mJnRYN8iITX+PBCI5oX4zDs9mxB/sEXGJC/I3t0S5 qeV3YZLUrmD0HxuHqgmYaPJPvn6moTMm3jJz+yzlnFeJOJyccUWkwif0orWCR+GxvWZWXC v4bJxqbRJ8JXj5B/+PUvGQZWOhIX03HNSsxMsYCsV09aNwovTCznNeYwWd4O7bt1N9nNcj 6sew3qZY/enGCMu1sgLTOEv75YLoJx5kCKPERQVFHE7FyiNSIvEnYo1znwlFlvTlEVMycZ UpPmrxO6eZJCGuNFgWeY1wvIb6Z100VJYv3/tUvHahDkKFHr5bbaKJRDUrOkEg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-5d5f5ff57c-tlhng; auth=pass smtp.auth=hostingeremail smtp.mailfrom=dhc@dcrocker.net
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout1.hostinger.io (gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout1.hostinger.io [35.184.15.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by 100.116.106.79 (trex/6.5.3); Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:08:42 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Suffer-Macabre: 1efc54c223231762_1648688921501_2608687579
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1648688921501:3486562880
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1648688921500
Received: from [192.168.0.112] (c-73-170-122-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.170.122.71]) (Authenticated sender: dhc@dcrocker.net) by smtp.hostinger.com (smtp.hostinger.com) with ESMTPSA id 4KTQD71JQkz2bkkg; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:08:39 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1648688920; bh=vezQnhwqdUwT6miuuY342ZIxQ/PfsLoUPUSA3i6VdxY=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:Reply-To:In-Reply-To; b=OMU2IU8PPs0N0YGIC1+HnBmvEaA61dS+ctb8qeFlTTCyYgxWd1z5vDDDhJr1Oq9Dx pwCzqGLvt4ml2v5TrV7zL8lsH8RvmLF5moIMCVSAVx88/3K7nFdPaahe8kgHgaeziP 6+/q7jKPHpU0kIPsjWe/qby6Z4MaJ4jHIQHe7wLT24aiyA4OkPFpdeh4jxkzxSErmP g+vR/oo2qoGMWXUO9LXVss/yeG/7LAZ6qTP2ASLGt+NJI+yoA/CtGl+6gAE36z+Z/I U4PjA7dpnaQAi8ex4QRB40+C8FG+ApdTRUcTNvoLY62d/HudnX1Ntcekga8Pgbdd+A ktJlXDvtID2eA==
Message-ID: <d0caa580-d707-7556-3b01-ad4572fc10d7@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:08:37 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Brotman, Alex" <Alex_Brotman=40comcast.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, ietf-smtp <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
References: <CH2PR11MB4342C5648A79FFEC1DE0FC45F71F9@CH2PR11MB4342.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <e29d7a95-2341-a176-8559-1df2c4e2f78a@dcrocker.net> <44D715B7767FFD3836B2E9B5@PSB>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
In-Reply-To: <44D715B7767FFD3836B2E9B5@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/DopXEr961FsYVneIuEbcp3WmpTs>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response for Detected Spam"
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 01:09:00 -0000
> (2) Alex should consider whether an enhanced code of the RFC My note was intended not to get into detail, but process and technical details certainly should affect choice for this. And, too, enhanced codes -- RFC 5248, with 3 IANA registries -- seem reasonable to me. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response for … Brotman, Alex
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Michael Peddemors
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Claus Assmann
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [EXTERNAL] Re: Updated draft for … Brotman, Alex
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Richard Clayton
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Richard Clayton
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Return codes, was Updated draft f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Return codes, was Updated draft f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Return codes, was Updated draft f… Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Return codes, was Updated draft f… John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Return codes, was Updated draft f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Return codes, was Updated draft f… John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Return codes, was Updated draft f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Return codes, was Updated draft f… Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Return codes, was Updated draft f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Brotman, Alex
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Brotman, Alex
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Updated draft for "SMTP Response … Hector Santos