Re: [ietf-smtp] [Tools-discuss] IETF mail server blacklisted by abusix.com (was: I hate mail these days (was: Re: Deine Mail ist kaputt))
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 05 May 2022 21:26 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BE0C15948A; Thu, 5 May 2022 14:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id id3nEb3mk55A; Thu, 5 May 2022 14:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D310DC14F73E; Thu, 5 May 2022 14:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KvRZj68HWzDCbn; Thu, 5 May 2022 23:26:05 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <YnQ0qhI8Kg5vro43@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 23:26:05 +0200
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org, ietf-822@ietf.org, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 673478765.413232-e18629ffe310e0336f71ef6c2c42e5fb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <57CBA59F-6E3A-4592-94BE-CF7E68C34670@tzi.org>
References: <YnQ0qhI8Kg5vro43@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/E0Yflm2Vi0mClqGKQw3zlJdeZyw>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [Tools-discuss] IETF mail server blacklisted by abusix.com (was: I hate mail these days (was: Re: Deine Mail ist kaputt))
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 21:26:15 -0000
A couple corrections… (Sorry for the overly wide reply.) > See appended, CarstenB complained I didn’t complain — I just informed you of information that I wasn’t sure you had (apparently it indeed hadn’t reached you in any other way). > about my university (@cs.fau.de) mailing system > rejecting emails from the IETF list mail 50.223.129.194 (from cbor mailing list, > which he is admin of), (Well, I had the list set up before there was a CBOR WG and I still get the bounces…) > resulting now in my membership (tte+ietf@cs.fau.de) in cbor@ietf.org > to be automatically blocked by the IETF mail server. And me not even seemingly able to > resubscribe. > > Yada yada yada (see mail error below), my university seems to use > abusix.com blacklist discovery, and the IETF mail server is actually > on their Spam blocklist: > > https://lookup.abusix.com/search?q=50.223.129.194 Yes. This is probably related to the IETF mail server being moved to a new address recently, which may have previous dirt attached to its white shirt. > If i read correctly what they write, Well, they’ll try to tout the quality of their data, but we do know that this is a hard problem… Grüße, Carsten
- [ietf-smtp] IETF mail server blacklisted by abusi… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [Tools-discuss] IETF mail server … Carsten Bormann