Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 22 July 2020 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231643A0AC5 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpDisCiNAg9p for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CB43A0745 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1595420594; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=o7ddBX1vWflyYrZlxWGoIUWpl95ZfYtAgQtOCefvHu0=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=nQh1qBKoqE/Bv5t1IC+L3yYNtnciS4ipAFzdFcNhzOTZKiYwqyErxdv5t3bAyhalgeHPrp vk+sNcCJKmVqnhcVeTSr/XsaM9RlYV42msEk/37iYh23sjTb4k1YgJSw8zoiJm4HdXOfLy QRuHt+PMFpM51z72ZeczYcGEY9jnECM=;
Received: from [172.27.248.213] (connect.isode.net [172.20.0.72]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <XxgvsQAkBkNp@waldorf.isode.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:23:14 +0100
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>, ietf-smtp <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
References: <ead2de74-68be-144c-1a6a-4d55e3ab59c2@isode.com> <d9373795-7119-1ada-acc5-d564bf7ff793@dcrocker.net>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <f750a1ff-a341-090e-048c-d78ab077e4a4@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:22:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
In-Reply-To: <d9373795-7119-1ada-acc5-d564bf7ff793@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/EPVs_2TzBaJEizqLwQNzMucOhuo>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:23:17 -0000

On 22/07/2020 13:16, Dave Crocker wrote:

> On 7/22/2020 5:07 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> This working group will conduct that limited review and revision, and 
>> publish new versions of these documents at Internet Standard status, 
>> per RFC 6410. The limited review is restricted to include corrections 
>> and clarifications only, such as verified errata and errata marked as 
>> "held for document update", however the WG is not limited to only 
>> addressing submitted errata. No new protocol extensions or amendments 
>> will be considered for inclusion into 5321bis and 5322bis documents, 
>> unless they are already published as RFCs.
>
>
> Possible refinement to the wording of this paragraph:
>
> This working group will conduct that limited review and revision, and 
> will publish new versions of these documents at Internet Standard 
> status, per RFC 6410. The limited review is restricted to corrections 
> and clarifications only. In addition to processing existing, verified 
> errata and errata marked as "held for document update", the WG may 
> address newly-offered errata.  However, no new protocol extensions or 
> amendments will be considered for inclusion into 5321bis and 5322bis 
> documents, unless they are already published as RFCs.

I think this is a good suggestion. So I like your version.


Best Regards,

Alexey