IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] ALPN

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 10 July 2021 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF723A13AC for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=m+SbG/NR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=G+x81hBu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FB-k2km6rHmk for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E9C3A13A3 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12219 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2021 21:43:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=2fb9.60ea149e.k2107; bh=a6pvhvw1PZkElT1dca+nAlqPBQqNNDq8Wk3etMYNFPY=; b=m+SbG/NRVCYqeuVFqdHPlyqlkD0akRfgvAweSWiBROoiqEM3WQs1VkAMtRQktlvS3oE5vGMCoDOM4dpeJaOrLCa/MwL9DEnpeh9QHL+9X6kyTTw+R47JjEMHE763phe1a+ivzyKTdRFQYH25F42wiNl0w5pxNnTXsc6MNd7cuDE+FWis86XmU75C6njw9bI8HZQFGUCQJJUdSNSWWSwlorOflaihmIi1bxlduEOiHgVoM8bBViri3DLtiAdw2Q6qWVI2XR2ryKmQR0iZ5r7pOUALjnf2/uC2EkFxKQ1FRO2riY2eQgLmjYXjL0/+x2zneD2yRE6GWuAS77SpY1OvwQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=2fb9.60ea149e.k2107; bh=a6pvhvw1PZkElT1dca+nAlqPBQqNNDq8Wk3etMYNFPY=; b=G+x81hBuI4Mk77ojTMV2r+Nr1X5tbwlxdEC+nL/DAyk4LNK141buWbMXwEcMpNOQrt4+OYZHK+KXUod01OYtwRXbnyRPaH5Fowrxn1qkM3yWWL9GYFD2HuMbqw++0y36EW8gmzUeZHPtQIb+brmsl/5xQ5OWcyU2aIIOUeToOaOtt9tl9JncW1hsd2EmIG/cEKYP9qVkVuPyn6dA8B2ca27kUNTHWAwv+Jx21CekDNVeYnmmpHpmaIDUP+33yh67HWJ39ucxQVmkjcnGO35DUt7AYs3nAqa7YgHFqeNTrWqgslvgGNdWjrmYRejPltuFTNwRANbsy4RxCoQsQmZ+yg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 10 Jul 2021 21:43:58 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 911F71FF0F6B; Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:43:56 -0400
Message-Id: <20210710214357.911F71FF0F6B@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20210710054151.GA45194@kiel.esmtp.org>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/HNe_zKjooDilU-1G53Eetj2qG_M>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] ALPN
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 21:44:08 -0000

It appears that Claus Assmann  <ietf-smtp@ietf.org> said:
>On Thu, Jul 08, 2021, John Levine wrote:
>
>> Maybe we should request two, one for SMTP and one for SUBMIT.
>
>Is it worth the hassle? What problem does that solve?  Isn't one
>for SMTP enough to resolve the potential protocol attacks?

I dunno.  It's not immediately obvious what the problem would be
to share the same ALPN among all four mail applications, SMTP,
SUBMIT, IMAP, and POP.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email