Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 23 July 2020 04:01 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5203D3A0C09 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8-_7VHaLiHy for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2143A0C08 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1285C0172 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:01:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:01:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=cgssfo qpMNujbfXqqkLIroeG31mf+zWqbkPxV3bxBMk=; b=TwktvQH+LR5ZahlIag6/ms FwXlrEddSOtMs9Svi055EyOWZUlTTrGE3TgEfleIGXRxq9xIXVghCt3t1eYekfVf Qh5B3R++HQAV1Ee0IPoNiE48L/CHcJHviybviKlDBzZIeYLaX0w5h0Wceh+Vf/wW t/0s9DoWw4fkhkZM3WVtnSKdAwdRHHIMlH9lZgYCbQ5T8JWV2pGQv+lQaM/sLDQU X5sTC0KWLf2Uig7nhEtt8lHMVxkXuqaKz0RPRfZP7LGRkME+okAarcBFaDAK461B vuIpQRBMlksXhhR5m6ptNQ0gN79LRbEC3TPFEXc536L5nejwyv/sXNtKOtOTXYYQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:igsZX07lIKbHx9Npmb6Ls9K2C2N-pSfx3iSqOj5UhOK88uZfeLuPyg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrhedtgdekudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtderre dtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhr khdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevfeetudeigedtle dvvddtudefjeejffdvfeetjeeiueelgfdtgfegtdffkeetudenucfkphepuddtkedrvddv uddrudektddrudehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:igsZX17S45k6dZIbNBQsWEpVfsVeWtn2LEOGwSpti7HFFY-j1u94iA> <xmx:igsZXzdeCZ-eg6M8zLNeJFeHuTMcidwGYTFgYZqbd4jhaivMQ1X3pw> <xmx:igsZX5LzOfPbir6inWQg1OLnj1QDjLutG5FSybsRaBCwcOiCL8VeKw> <xmx:igsZX8LCdz8kBZzhRxcfJo6qs80zmN8mgqs_hapBgO45WKWJgvHRTQ>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D5C7830600A9 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:01:13 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <579f408c-ed7e-9dbe-f626-f0dab2380d13@isode.com> <1DD51B1C-03DE-457C-BD7B-F3E4E05EA692@aegee.org> <rf9tad$12u6$1@gal.iecc.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <fd2c6aca-6a31-7ae5-3780-2dbbecf84a87@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:01:13 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rf9tad$12u6$1@gal.iecc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5E5FE533439C3FCD8BC193EB"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/HdPCACwzUEOsoFKe3RIGUjc4qR8>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 04:01:16 -0000

On 7/22/20 1:34 PM, John Levine wrote:

>> My reading is thay the above text clarifies to prefer 465 over 587.
> Some of us disagree about how well this advice matches reality. See
> you at the BOF.

What does it even mean to say that this does or does not match "reality"?

Keith