IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: STARTTLS & EHLO

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 29 January 2009 13:37 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0TDbgf1013374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:37:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n0TDbgLZ013373; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:37:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0TDbT1g013358 for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:37:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:56599) by ppsw-6.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1LSX5E-0004q0-JY (Exim 4.70) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:37:28 +0000
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1LSX5E-0002Je-1b (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:37:28 +0000
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:37:28 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Paul Smith <paul@pscs.co.uk>
cc: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>, ietf-smtp@imc.org
Subject: Re: STARTTLS & EHLO
In-Reply-To: <498088B8.9040404@pscs.co.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0901291310080.4546@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <497DE492.4080506@pscs.co.uk> <497DED29.70402@att.com> <497ED420.30708@pscs.co.uk> <alpine.LSU.2.00.0901271403220.4546@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <497F86CB.60904@att.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.0901281434440.4546@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <498088B8.9040404@pscs.co.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> To me, it was (initially) 'clear' that the example saying 'such as the
> argument to the EHLO command', was precise enough to imply that the fact
> that the EHLO command was sent should not be discarded. It could have
> said 'such as the EHLO command', but it went out of its way to say '*the
> argument to* the EHLO command'.

But there's plenty of other information that the server has to discard -
for example any AUTH results, any partial MAIL transactions - which isn't
explicitly listed in RFC 3207.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email