Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 23 July 2020 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1404B3A095E for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TbEzWGcNKCkq for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0173A094A for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF17389B8; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:18:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3JW98u4ZTeXN; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DA6389B5; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E301CB; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:38:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <795414fd-839f-aca4-0a6b-1924e293d437@network-heretics.com>
References: <579f408c-ed7e-9dbe-f626-f0dab2380d13@isode.com> <3b8e5d41-1b61-ca9e-f257-792d3d0f0f6e@dcrocker.net> <a9915d28-8a32-e5d4-daee-6b32775030f5@isode.com> <795414fd-839f-aca4-0a6b-1924e293d437@network-heretics.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:38:25 -0400
Message-ID: <20615.1595518705@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/IYjlVJRYVPYO9rCnJykKSF0bYKs>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:38:30 -0000

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
    > If the purpose of the EMAILCORE WG is indeed to bring the current message
    > format and SMTP specifications to Full Standard, I further propose that any
    > features not in those specifications should be out-of-scope for the WG,
    > unless perhaps any new features are (a) already at Proposed Standard; (b)
    > widely implemented enough to also be considered for Full Standard; and (c)
    > necessary for inclusion in the core specifications in order for the complete
    > set of revised specifications (core + new features) to qualify for Full
    > Standard.

I imagine that you would include SPF and DKIM in this list.

Would you include DMARC, and the new list-friendly version, of which I know
little?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [