Re: [ietf-smtp] SMTP status codes 251 and 551

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 10 February 2020 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAF0120847 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:18:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1H0OjGqgf7us for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A1DF120827 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id f70so1397667ill.6 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:18:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=d9ItJSpGBq8xoVMVVr1Eo5ZdGjnfMEz59AT7O7Og5xA=; b=bLD0fDO3ggKtigH8OI0G6A20Vi4Tv/NRSWI3go7FgTR0zehC9cgEfdoQnnLC+dpAnm AwtqlBW7bR67O8xkFqqPX65NhrED+E5wDSdC/e/T/5QcEFtyCdYsf9VXjtn4eQvjuBlI P/wmvdrKEFyBeAVLLWcQtVrM9tBGuNFML/AcU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=d9ItJSpGBq8xoVMVVr1Eo5ZdGjnfMEz59AT7O7Og5xA=; b=iYy8mpO9c775GP9cUJRthtY2A0WLcXSXxs3MzRM5piy3M+P/8lBd9tVE8SaKvaR/wD uHOtC6RqdL+ylNcsFNsIUbayAJ2x/VPEtNozhfdynDkzUSOWCa9o+01I+o7hhHZ6niOP nXxZdJu052drFuY4m1+9AEN9hFnBqvis19dvpNI1NTvjoy9j3d9DBcm6DY4oukQoZmhZ ymCEMpoHNJWgCD0HsTnkYbhJ54XN4OiBG7qHd/4WJpP1dMhlVZwDswiw6yYEERn5fIXj pg52np7w61v1QP7sdlPwaBSx+lmsqATWrHI+S/SiyFn1rL44Bvz//iAyskWev+4oeD3n 8TyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXgDfWEWoybmpgPxJS9vIk+rYeDJrWV4KEN0ibOlmZf4un50x5H Ur1VGt/w0KFIScLYZ8to1gh4r3Z6KQKXqDEubcSE+w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxNekYBzhj7nNR1lO2pkmCQ6+VjuLMl0RK3/YdPlkzW34HxyhAyIJ7oc7vI2TtM6I4xk25f8MSsKrLfRA46syU=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:1d92:: with SMTP id g18mr3192206ile.23.1581365903748; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:18:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <644DAD60BFC9A9FC2C84194A@PSB> <20200210201056.379361400B14@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20200210201056.379361400B14@ary.qy>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:17:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1r5MTFE+CMD=2T_n6S28+XjHdeOd29GM9hEfgU3Bb+7Eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: uucp@computer.org
Cc: SMTP Discuss <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f4045e059e3e7002"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/LlnCUMMQRqnb2h3zNxpONQUEU-8>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] SMTP status codes 251 and 551
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:18:26 -0000

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:11 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

>
> Another large change since the 1980s is that then most people read
> their mail on the same computer where the mail was stored, now nobody
> does and we all use IMAP.  So I've told the town people how to set up
> Gmail to collect mail from a mailbox here and switched back to local
> delivery.  That avoids nearly all of the delivery issues since there's
> no DMARC checks on fetched mail and for the most part it assumes that
> stuff being fetched is OK.
>

Seems like an interesting security/spearphishing hole - find someone who
receives mail on a system that might not be as aggressively filtered and
then reads it via another service which might not apply the same rigor or
warnings for fetched mail as it would for delivered mail. Of course most
mobile MUAs fall squarely into that latter category besides which security
items are the first things to be elided from the UX due to screen pixel
shortages.

--Kurt