Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Sun, 19 July 2020 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734423A0998 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 12:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-khFIbe5XU4 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 12:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1B083A0997 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 12:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B322C0195; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 20:16:13 +0100 (IST)
Authentication-Results: stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Authentication-Results: stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1595186173; bh=bB8zYZhPCaXcHHeSyaPufHuyaNolf88/v6yMiU+a7F0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=drsPnySO0RzJPPh+mhbEtWmee8fdwysf5CvlBmsC8bz9FczS/q5CwHbFUqvCGtMdV v6Xm5B0PQvQFlQjVUfBFBuUJ/j00aSGeXdeXVezdvgI6wmKGriYksn9Pir8ZW9XIw6 TQiPkTZIJLjagzkn497RmsL18GxqSXbOtlp99ojM=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1595186172-26497-26494/9/5; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 19:16:12 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 21:10:33 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <67dd92d1-9ed6-4a1e-bff6-f9d9339dfd3a@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <B7E061A14E80279E1E14D92F@PSB>
References: <81c2a19c-f19e-b495-3441-22c2a112037c@linuxmagic.com> <52D9A14B4CDD14BB4C97C355@PSB> <CAKFo7w=9_eZda47ZMUv_NE9iN1FEnGM7m3nUFy3_Wq4se+W8XQ@mail.gmail.com> <DE8B2C33275660E19FFA513C@PSB> <CAKFo7wmsm+1ck5G7Sj-NpnyXgeHd14cxGQ6K9KFeVG0_CTM1sw@mail.gmail.com> <5C6196E28FCDC4A312E73A00@PSB> <CAKFo7wk+jLGqjs6mU=Gv3G1xAg+O5OyTmt66fjW4DLzUT5kuPw@mail.gmail.com> <20200719144357.A64221D393E2@ary.qy> <ce227a65-05f8-4b3a-b464-5720cd39fc3b@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <B7E061A14E80279E1E14D92F@PSB>
User-Agent: Trojita/0.7; Qt/5.11.3; xcb; Linux; Devuan GNU/Linux 3 (beowulf)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/NbmAmA2tA3Cohlu-y3neYI9lOYQ>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Curious, with this now being associated to emailcore, should list name change?
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 19:10:39 -0000

On Sunday 19 July 2020 20:19:52 CEST, John C Klensin wrote:
> <Sounds of virtual vomiting>
>
> It is interesting that every one of these starts in "X-".

It looks shorter, but uglier, if I exclude X-. Avert your eyes now:

 Staticcontent1_Header1_F731d3dc-Fd31-4161-Ad91-1083ba56853f
 Staticcontent2_Header2_F731d3dc-Fd31-4161-Ad91-1083ba56853f
 {Emails_Custom_Header_Prefix}Subscriber-Uid
 {Emails_Custom_Header_Prefix}Campaign-Uid
 {Emails_Custom_Header_Prefix}Customer-Gid
 {Emails_Custom_Header_Prefix}Customer-Uid
 {Emails_Custom_Header_Prefix}Delivery-Sid
 {Emails_Custom_Header_Prefix}Tracking-Did
 /Usr/Usr/Lib/Ecartis/Ecartis.Logreceived
 /Usr/Local/Ecartis/Ecartis.Logreceived
 Antivirus.Cortanet.Com.Mx-Mail-From
 {Emails_Custom_Header_Prefix}Mailer
 (Anti-Spam-(Anti-Spam-Mime-Version
 Lcs-Mailantivirus-System-Mail-From
 {Emails_Custom_Header_Prefix}Ebs
 Prayed-Neutralize-Impressionable
 Authentication-Results-Original
 Original-Authentication-Results
 Regenerates-Root-Insensitivity
 Discarded-X400-Mts-Extensions
 Require-Recipient-Valid-Since
 Academia-Accosts-Occidentals
 Forward-Confirmed-Reversedns
 Sun-Java-System-Smtp-Warning
 Antivirus-Sistema-Mail-From

Some might say that these are the worst even including X-. I, uh, I don't 
know what to say, but maybe doing these queries may not have been a good 
idea and you should shoot me now. "Authentication-Results-Original 
Original-Authentication-Results" oh god.

Arnt