Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header ?
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 08 March 2020 01:00 UTC
Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8983A1E33 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 17:00:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imDG4wJ4aqd0 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 17:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496453A1E2E for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 17:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFC02208A; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 20:00:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 07 Mar 2020 20:00:37 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=6Ql1cEti7PDTMkPhO8qNgT7r4IEhC9kHvpSUkLGGH Uk=; b=JSgGDqACnskMLYFSf/Ycj+eFW8gyyxtlu51K9XYi7Fk6TIFb7D2n4sI0j EjTFw0ooS7MlyxOCqt/xCU4Hw+E+p9i6XfCyj0IHaxDRSsvm8GVdkf5Q25FhMbdf pEpiEHT++0FuingQ5/aIjTDxDEDkBYZbKB9FwpexZxVj62fjAuZNnUjlt8RjW96z BAaP5vIkETfwVWNOFeM5trciuE1fcpD99YjHJGub58jnKTpbVW7FNA/dD8KxWYpG xbijBo7w0Qz1qljfCH8+AAbZp+2z/JSmouX7itJ6Ne+oXc38Xlv73RmxMzVxNYxU OZo9/eoQXly5KpxlW9MMD9l4Z+NWA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:tUNkXqz0LWgf3kMVm7x0OhfEbHqHKYn5AuoOqI4kJeFV-TT6oWkuEA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudduhedgvdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrud ehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhho ohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:tUNkXgH9Xs8k-om8C0T5sJTYdc4MtVACZeiDHmTO5fL4xoEbbSHw_g> <xmx:tUNkXrKKVcOInyGu0Yvcn4cjmVkxgYwylRp1zgmFUzpP4SrVtcWuqA> <xmx:tUNkXr4jhdzBdPpA5qiDNnNTiOJYzjAYQxCCwevJm42VRWM4GgU3sg> <xmx:tUNkXn_Ct64v9UvTzg554lBNrL3Vp7G_YfNghAP36jSbgUZtw0F-7A>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 207103280060; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 20:00:37 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <20200305043414.0E7C515740C2@ary.qy> <87055.1583465260@turing-police> <9DF11014-4C79-49DE-B17E-12B87F2FF17C@isc.org>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <b73ab366-f270-c3ee-be04-dcf16dceae47@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 20:00:36 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9DF11014-4C79-49DE-B17E-12B87F2FF17C@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/O4B7zZSPdETyGcvcO8OACTSl_i0>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header ?
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 01:00:50 -0000
On 3/5/20 10:36 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > Conversion of all ASCII headers to utf-8 mime encoded should be banned. Apart > from testing encoding/decoding it serves no useful purpose and if you want > to perform such testing you can always add a non ASCII character. MUA’s that > do this are deliberately breaking interoperability with old MUAs. +1 Keith
- [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header ? John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… Paul Smith
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… Valdis Kl ē tnieks
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… Mark Andrews
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… Valdis Kl ē tnieks
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Is this a valid Message-ID header… Keith Moore