Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be

[John C Klensin <[e-mail]>]

--On Wednesday, 22 July, 2020 05:31 -0700 Dave Crocker
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 7/22/2020 5:23 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>> In the paragraph Dave edited, I for some reason find the word
>> "that" as  feeling out of place. I need to read it a few more
>> times.
> 
> Just to confirm, I assume you mean:
> 
>  > This working group will conduct that limited review and
> revision, ...
> 
> I was trying to preserve as much of the original text as I
> could and didn't even think about this.  In context it works,
> given the paragraph that precedes it.  But it certainly isn't
> essential.  Also, it's worth making the paragraph stand on its
> own.
> 
> So, perhaps...
> 
>       This working group will conduct a limited review and
> revision to the base email specifications, and will publish
> new versions of these documents at Internet Standard status,
> per RFC 6410. The limited review is restricted to corrections
> and clarifications only. In addition to processing existing,
> verified errata and errata marked as "held for document
> update", the WG may address newly-offered errata.  However, no
> new protocol extensions or amendments will be considered for
> inclusion into 5321bis and 5322bis documents, unless they are
> already published as RFCs.

Shouldn't that be "standards track RFCs"?   As I read 2026, even
as modified by 6410, there are no other possibilities consistent
with publishing 5321bis and 5322bis as Internet Standards.  

   john