Re: [ietf-smtp] Some RFC2142 adoption data
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 11 February 2022 21:18 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526DB3A0CBB for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:18:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3VOKYJL-VxdQ for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:18:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F342E3A0CC1 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:18:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1nIdJ3-000Ly2-TG; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:18:17 -0500
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:18:11 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, SMTP Interest Group <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D16E25E86745D0576AFFF1B2@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <27abe0c2-85d9-80e7-c329-b2e474954e0a@tana.it>
References: <27abe0c2-85d9-80e7-c329-b2e474954e0a@tana.it>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/TFGVSmKeQXM5K7wQQ9z4MZIU1Qk>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Some RFC2142 adoption data
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 21:18:25 -0000
--On Friday, February 11, 2022 19:46 +0100 Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote: > Hi all, > > The European Commission has published a comprehensive study on > DNS abuse: > > Study on Domain Name System (DNS) abuse, 2022 > https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/616244 > > Study on Domain Name System (DNS) abuse : technical report. > Appendix 1, 2022 > https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/473317 > > Chapter 18 of the Appendix (2nd link above) contains data on > role addresses. They also tested the RNAME address of SOA > records of 1M Tranco domains. I only attach the Venn diagram. One thing I find extremely interesting about this is that, independent of what RFC 2142 adds to the list, there has been one specific role address -- postmaster-- that has been _required_ since at least the time of RFCs 822 and 1123 and it apparently was not adopted heavily enough to make that chart. I have no idea what that means except that it leaves me a bit suspicious of the data and the means used to obtain it. john
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Some RFC2142 adoption data John C Klensin
- [ietf-smtp] Some RFC2142 adoption data Alessandro Vesely