Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 03 January 2020 15:11 UTC
Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94F4120043 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:11:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1g4uR73B93WF for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:11:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E00E120046 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:11:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62032216CA; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:11:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:11:18 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=sUYZM2fBSfxSYAKT8Wv/pLiOo2348lybIA+ZOmjr+ ds=; b=iZZWttR4vbpWTQbzhzKYiHp5FqBH6Mr4hlHhVZDShNlWI32fHTXgsldYN TJZNZj/SlAxCEo6UTMpfe7AcyVQ8XJ1dF/n2X2jUM6sA2SsI9KHTfINILwvbrGIU aRo9dVom6F/bgh6Bu/R+3RB+RJuzo2wPOdh9TwNsHL2Aw/ZlW/tEyFfGq37wJk/c BYyp10yvzCUfLXOEJGiQFleGbIA4DugdefPyCNAEV07y4d0pwTgLpL1LH3MPxncS ZuJuCmOdva14aW4ucXwInM6jiFpyydzFbS9ghqk1FZr1Fd+oAV8UOKrnIz7KKt02 8l+VCkliWgcLmMXcPEkLzFCInko6g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:lVkPXtC8hxb4jAe7CasRWGMDxEjGaVcmYuoxiKIim63hP878pMILIQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvdegfedgjeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptgfgggfuhfgjfffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihht hhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh eqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehhthhtphifihhllhgsvghthhgvlhgrshhtrghpphhlihgtrght ihhonhhsthhonhhothhnvggvughiphhvgehsuhhpphhorhhtshhomhgvfihhvghrvgdrsh honecukfhppeelledrvddtfedrfedvrddutdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep mhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:lVkPXl9Sx8RVH5dLl7MdsQVRll1FTZhYLuXGScLYx05juDEAPwfLjw> <xmx:lVkPXgHr3YC7cgQdBMFMLezkOjnGrW4HfddcIhr-4dPSrUh09cmcKQ> <xmx:lVkPXvQWfD_68hA2VsE2KBTnxq2FTl6p_nMPyDtx8EuaLsK-RxQKCA> <xmx:llkPXt9D4rkDMHRRf5zamEYBbkbF6DwgkraHvD8p7tEnfybtpUMI_Q>
Received: from [30.64.126.197] (ip-99-203-32-10.pools.cgn.spcsdns.net [99.203.32.10]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 847868005A; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:11:17 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <501e94b2-1f76-442a-8c3e-a3bc46c51aca@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:11:15 -0500
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <3412B4E4-878C-4D7C-BFE0-2D3BB5C52569@network-heretics.com>
References: <501e94b2-1f76-442a-8c3e-a3bc46c51aca@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17C54)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/WdP50CC_QtkWIkV8Tmd9CpnMar8>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 15:11:22 -0000
> On Jan 2, 2020, at 2:09 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote: > > Running a v6-only host is stupid at this point, I don’t share that assumption for multiple reasons. One is that the Internet is a diverse place and there are lots of corner cases. It’s not the case that every internet host needs to interact with hosts using ipv4. Another is that v6 networks are likely to support some sort of NAT solution which permits v6 clients to contact v4 servers as long as those servers have dns names and public ipv4 addresses. In general I’d recommend that applications that can be IP version agnostic, be so. As applied to SMTP I think that means accepting both IPv4 and IPv6 syntax, but not actually caring what the peer’s address is. > perhaps slightly less stupid in five years, but even so I don't think the next RFCs should feature an IPv4 requirement for address literals, and nothing for the main parts of the protocols. I would like for 5321bis to provide clear guidance to implementors rather than having a practical necessity for them to implement protocol features that have been removed from the standard. I expect that smtp and http will be the last applications to not need ipv4 support somewhere. So I don’t think it’s helpful to remove v4 address literals from the smtp protocol. However it might be worth relaxing the syntax so that at least from a protocol perspective, smtp ehlo doesn’t care what kind of argument is used. Keith
- [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forwa… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contiibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contiibution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contiibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Laura Atkins
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Laura Atkins
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Laura Atkins
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- [ietf-smtp] It's not about IP-Literals, its about… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] SMTP client certs John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Richard Clayton
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- [ietf-smtp] lounging around Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] lounging around John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on submission auth… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] lounging around John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] lounging around Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] lounging around Dave Crocker