IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-smtp] CHUNKING and PIPELINING

Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> Sat, 06 March 2021 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jgh@wizmail.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6324C3A180B for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Mar 2021 15:09:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=wizmail.org header.b=JUjZQPF7; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wizmail.org header.b=R5++TWHv
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KdPTNpICd2PX for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Mar 2021 15:09:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wizmail.org (wizmail.org [IPv6:2a00:1940:107::2:0:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65203A1819 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Mar 2021 15:09:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wizmail.org; s=e202001; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive: Autocrypt; bh=BejgMeP8CM03o6yKayNmAmNwNfDCoIl/CCqyylDmQqk=; b=JUjZQPF7EwLPdpw 61EbBxuwfFY3hqIM7UwH+eUN8WIN9/CYHok7/+w/gdO41mO2ynxLIJgmx5k6a95EKERywBA==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wizmail.org ; s=r202001; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc :MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive:Autocrypt; bh=BejgMeP8CM03o6yKayNmAmNwNfDCoIl/CCqyylDmQqk=; b=R5++TWHv8VEp39gA3UBo3y4qIh 9VGGJ2iu9XxAjnp4tYyCzEFnOnhF/42nCR9nYu7nMuFO64kiiFYqdYFSWIhPggdIMutO1LD4PBqLW No0ymo9B4Z30IUaPIm6esy3NW5fQv2sPJRyqMXPXZQZfX0/n8L5mr42X6F4qtO6x6TKLylkKBgFWX 3rCXrebhv6QMhE46mSM5WYS7xSRGkixYu7F104bySD3AQGO4Yt8yLgaU/Kf5irIFkqPy1TWFhOvjG yrckcQn48zal+33iWTkpdxldv4DIK3/cEqklzZoRTMFfOVoxyvnl6VAy0sxMT5Rqss8Ym6JRJVTBc ZHghSAgQ==;
Authentication-Results: wizmail.org; iprev=pass (vgate18.wizint.net) smtp.remote-ip=2a00:1940:107::1:2f:0; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jgh@wizmail.org
Received: from vgate18.wizint.net ([2a00:1940:107::1:2f:0] helo=lap.dom.ain) by wizmail.org (Exim 4.94.115) (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 with esmtpsa id 1lIg2r-00C7z0-Rz for ietf-smtp@ietf.org (return-path <jgh@wizmail.org>); Sat, 06 Mar 2021 23:09:13 +0000
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Message-ID: <b1202e49-26b2-35d8-0db7-bb94acd0d52f@wizmail.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 23:09:13 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Pcms-Received-Sender: vgate18.wizint.net ([2a00:1940:107::1:2f:0] helo=lap.dom.ain) with esmtpsa
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Xlm2zXgjeRv9H_4sCt7sdHkI-kI>
Subject: [ietf-smtp] CHUNKING and PIPELINING
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 23:09:21 -0000

Is is permitted to pipeline a QUIT after a BDAT LAST?

RFC 3030 (SMTP Service Extensions
           for Transmission of Large
           and Binary MIME Messages)
does not say whether or not BDAT LAST is a synch point per
RFC 2929 (SMTP Service Extension for Command Pipelining).

2920 says (3.1) :-
"The actual transfer of message content is explicitly allowed to be
    the first "command" in a group."

-- 
Cheers,
   Jeremy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email