Re: [ietf-smtp] spinning our wheels, was Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-email-deliveredto-02.txt

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sun, 21 February 2021 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D346C3A10FF for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 12:44:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CK6uJ62hwvQG for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 12:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dormouse.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (dormouse.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407863A10E0 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 12:44:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5180E101C8C; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nl-srv-smtpout4.hostinger.io (100-105-161-73.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.105.161.73]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6ACF0101A0B; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:44:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from nl-srv-smtpout4.hostinger.io ([UNAVAILABLE]. [145.14.159.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.105.161.73 (trex/6.0.2); Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:44:01 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Cooing-Industry: 2602dcaf56beb542_1613940241093_3025478798
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1613940241093:3934546578
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1613940241093
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (Authenticated sender: dhc@dcrocker.net) by nl-srv-smtpout4.hostinger.io (smtp.hostinger.com) with ESMTPSA id 4E716310E57A; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:43:57 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1613940238; bh=XjKzo128z3CuJpvv/svMXsR9BCVj6MeyBiqUOe1BtUU=; h=Reply-To:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=DpQy1sN86t+JYmQI6JlksfrSn7/jFjqMRXyHw8AosDTt6fxTYgtduLJ3cwy3uDCJ/ 0Cm3V68nTDp3wj9JYdyvQjF1BBo7I+kHpLthqRvdXnCUE738SZG1/ZWctXvMpvGLht ehMhyhI1SsnQlIofRTCaMxHu9bUaZI7at2wGvHw9l1mwEIfPdUq8ZNINN+GhzMqUd0 tNDMFdMSZN6Ve0cTQ5njK8t4EkSlzs9zzg1J1khwqUplXaUh+5L5ygBAH38XZoXOQb nY7k7G3dljoQ71CT1JGHMXbJGizV/MjhCQVSHttMnvR/UW1ut5KQ1ADPESe4HvKdEg 7Lb2XvAuxfxLA==
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <20210221202821.3F43D6E6BC67@ary.qy>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <3ba85211-e773-028b-5899-4ce3c6bfe9d1@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 12:43:54 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210221202821.3F43D6E6BC67@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/XoHpYGno283oUSY46ixx8Gdx-u4>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] spinning our wheels, was Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-email-deliveredto-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:44:05 -0000

On 2/21/2021 12:28 PM, John Levine wrote:
> This draft does not do that.  What it describes is nothing like the behavior of those
> MTAs,


I've asked for specifics, multiple times.  They haven't been provided.

Rather than simply repeating your conclusion, what, exactly, does this 
draft have wrong?

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net