IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 02 January 2020 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186F9120096 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:58:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGlY38N31rkc for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:58:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC3A12004D for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:58:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5167BA; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:58:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Jan 2020 16:58:44 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=cVCs+LkVprc7BnxBDPfoA3PmeSvayREud+q4RpGfC zM=; b=O0uqqYRfIDHQDEM5Nnhab3ucZVm+fAHFadZQb94XRXQDRKbB9ZyivINqQ l00ZefCZthLb0viX3jpWeuEEsWImfrOyBJcKyY3LShJk43BbTxbQrC4aGi6PbcHc dFK54ntIZIZ9NOWZ5H7Wxt5pAp06e0olIVQXb+8IJIqkISjZJ3OYEW7uQmCYDA7L wnDt4ogb5dD0f8X/KWQFNyHTHTcFN44OOqluUBDVrhJgjogHZwVOda4p9Fw1leUS v8Dy3/9fDNVchvsz/7UUCjRFqELRf8k7VlTCvk7cKi5VbHEU0Utenzq7F2XmsXJ6 OGoeqjofvlL1kjTC+H3T9QLtN5iYQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:k2cOXjAf69vB5HiNKQYXP7oM0CImrbGju8aAwky3v5rIi9z-ivz4Aw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvdeguddgudehiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesth ekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrd duheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgv rhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:k2cOXqx8A10h3Nwnoki1tW8nR5Y_mvOyO3G0wy7GbE8c-h28OdgvdQ> <xmx:k2cOXtSe8nD9MP1MQPY6LaeoQ_g6cOD9463TvmXEENTV4O7T6h4Nnw> <xmx:k2cOXn0500bCKV5YQ05O0RAHJ7a12ZGbg2SG_cgvnXf0Snvc6Pu9vg> <xmx:lGcOXmLj4HRIAjYLTkggzVKaeezSeuLiwgcLbtgegKG57qWrPammDA>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F37853060741; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:58:42 -0500 (EST)
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <20200101175510.8549A11E2905@ary.qy> <D441E0BE-1F32-4329-9296-A5026540E8D0@dukhovni.org> <994e7a23-9e80-4751-6067-8863ad0ee72f@network-heretics.com> <2Iq+URBKeODeFANB@highwayman.com> <5E0E04AA.5070408@isdg.net> <986919d8-613b-7e13-c39b-0f7f978ca763@network-heretics.com> <B7644591809D5C3CBB682F56@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <65a41f13-6a8f-95ef-2a6f-744a4604c546@dcrocker.net> <0fc9f066-ecd2-5e8e-e795-c778bc4847e8@network-heretics.com> <97F17D0555B461EB32F917E9@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <b5effcca-bec1-ad1c-d33f-683a03a43aa2@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 16:58:41 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <97F17D0555B461EB32F917E9@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ZqHfjSGLzaiypo7ZPjkXM2mC8IA>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 21:58:47 -0000

On 1/2/20 4:49 PM, John C Klensin wrote:

> If we are going to treat RFC 5598 and/or the discussions that
> led up to it as final and normative

For multiple reasons, I recommend that we NOT do that.   It might make 
sense to consider it as a starting point for language used in 5321bis, 
and perhaps, to revise 5598 in light of the 5321bis discussions, 
probably after the bits are dry for 5321bis.

But no matter what 5598 or any successor document says, people are going 
to continue to use e.g. "MTA" in several of slightly varying ways, 
depending on context.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email