Re: [ietf-smtp] own mail server: DNS / static IP / no bad reputation?

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 12 October 2020 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3703A09FC for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.113
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.113 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lMO0fWRO8ECl for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C03F73A0990 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.62.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 09CLhdX4032065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:43:39 -0700
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <01RQPKW2Y2E8005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <20201012184303.C3C2B234F9AF@ary.qy> <01RQQ0B48LT0005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <0d0d2fef-5c95-8f38-84f1-bbdbb38676b2@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:40:19 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <01RQQ0B48LT0005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/bpQRR8JHYjUQ_AZcrI7wxtaNGdw>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] own mail server: DNS / static IP / no bad reputation?
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 21:40:30 -0000

On 10/12/2020 1:04 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
> Is "filter responsibly" also off the table?


Actually, it seems like the perfect goal.

But it's not clear to me how that is achievable, absent something in the 
realm that defines in a way that is substantial and deterministic.

And it's not clear to me that that's viable while remaining effective, 
given that it ewill almost certainly enable bad actors to game the filter.

Or will it?


d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net