Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 23 July 2020 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2AB3A0CC3 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=u60ZFB31; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=s0H8Wv7J
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CD8N9sW12eHY for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33EEF3A0CC0 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 37946 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2020 18:58:53 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=9432.5f19dded.k2007; bh=Hb7YiEcfMMHLRgrzYNab3Vtt+PNfqXqkjq3JFwyahsI=; b=u60ZFB31GpKRhWg2/6AO1ULehEmnYMsrrZfn0+XMS760GkKkugstGp/349RqlAtXVkjXAgmFaXCjOGkhEMWkkcTUjf/sCS5bHT4lHNsnrsU+g21pjxR50tCYs//JMOQ4u9MncFCZFyQ+g7d9VMcE9TOh9823//KqBTeww0g+a4VBM5+i8kn+qIx2YhgKMb7SAFkIX8Y0j4RmDfjfo3q4yzTOW5S/+NH+NNawhHmRyVaZ2hJdxSqwWvPkYJYGNOj3
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=9432.5f19dded.k2007; bh=Hb7YiEcfMMHLRgrzYNab3Vtt+PNfqXqkjq3JFwyahsI=; b=s0H8Wv7JqZDsuj7RSBjo8o6PuEZxh39DO59WMXDumpi0uPcvo5XyzoccOjxM7PAIjYotvmknOpSp/kU9fgkv2s3swPfFm73kJKskVDG05w5S/Rt6ayHDAqkmEpDe0NOFJO6soJJ3KdHZshLVsk0b0ZEPKZVzNPUQhJjt9ijBT32DW4uzAAp0ofWR8Zy13pnR6o2gNXNWrDgHutbOVvWL1PjvSWE1fhHs8LtCuvC0gLl75Zuw6u7581PVncGEacXv
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 23 Jul 2020 18:58:52 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 43E3C1D6C234; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:58:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 23 Jul 2020 14:58:52 -0400
Message-Id: <20200723185852.43E3C1D6C234@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Cc: moore@network-heretics.com
In-Reply-To: <58f73c78-ed2e-98dc-85e7-380ecd5d5bda@network-heretics.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/cq_b52p__J4vDVYPdoxJaMw2Ci0>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:58:56 -0000

In article <58f73c78-ed2e-98dc-85e7-380ecd5d5bda@network-heretics.com> you write:
>> I imagine that you would include SPF and DKIM in this list.
>>
>> Would you include DMARC, and the new list-friendly version, of which I know
>> little?
>
>My strong preference would be to include none of these, and only SMTP 
>and MIME specifications.

I agree. DKIM and SPF sit on top of SMTP and are not part of it. DMARC
and ARC are even more sitting on top and are less part of it.

R's,
John