Re: [ietf-smtp] [Emailcore] Proposed ESMTP keyword RCPTLIMIT

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Mon, 19 April 2021 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B5B3A3F47 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mrochek.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id clskwsC2x8xo for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [98.153.82.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804123A3F4B for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01RY1YS1R69S00GON6@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf-smtp@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mrochek.com; s=201712; t=1618858444; bh=MuG5eSUySDJ8rPSNs8wQppCnL1bsqncppKhO6lB6TZo=; h=Cc:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:To:From; b=Z8UISW4l0RuhRW++gs/DXIinQt1y/IsZqBnJHaUyKMxVR7wbjyFsE/lmaSlNJw9WM 1D/hH8QfELZKtU9sRb5jdBmDsKg0ZxayF05cUW35cwgvNv9YIGLfnKg9naFimKTlkI Pokas4mF5XlwVW1h8+PRmumImHWrAzRAUKzg/x5Q=
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii; Format=flowed
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01RY1UKIVTTC0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Message-id: <01RY1YS046FW0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:44:57 -0400" <607D4309.8060500@isdg.net>
References: <20210418222305.C6BE4739A23B@ary.qy> <607D4309.8060500@isdg.net>
To: Hector Santos <hsantos=40isdg.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/d7t8u4pO7ryWVMgLsVpU6VrvXAI>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [Emailcore] Proposed ESMTP keyword RCPTLIMIT
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:59:16 -0000

> On 4/18/2021 6:23 PM, John Levine wrote:
> > Added it to my tiny MTA, too. The options to set limits were always
> > there, this just added a tiny plugin to add them to the EHLO response.
> >
> > $ telnet -4 mail2.iecc.com 25
> > Trying 64.57.183.52...
> > Connected to mail2.iecc.com.
> >
> > 220 mail2.iecc.com mailfront ESMTP
> > ehlo pedro.iecc.com
> > 250-mail2.iecc.com
> > 250-SMTPUTF8
> > 250-AUTH LOGIN
> > 250-LIMTS RCPTMAX=20 MAILMAX=5
> > 250-SIZE 100000000
> > 250-8BITMIME
> > 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
> > 250-PIPELINING
> > 250-CHUNKING
> > 250 STARTTLS
> > quit
> > 221 2.0.0 Good bye.
> >

> LIMTS or LIMITS?

LIMITS in the specification ;-)

> Ned, can you add examples to the draft?

Good idea. Consider it done.

				Ned