Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 28 July 2020 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41A63A0AB0 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wayI8W9d7TUV for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBFEA3A0ACD for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 06SAqZrH023498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:52:35 -0700
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
References: <20200723185852.43E3C1D6C234@ary.qy> <f68186e9-3996-a412-25ee-2f5edc0e4d6b@isode.com> <717549a3-a94c-0eae-dd28-5a3eb4250805@tana.it>
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <9376d4e1-0acf-8d81-685b-2a5a392feb1f@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:49:53 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <717549a3-a94c-0eae-dd28-5a3eb4250805@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/e8ZBscvM6tN7Dh-u_dgzMPSY37c>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed agenda for EMAILCORE BOF
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:50:02 -0000

On 7/28/2020 3:17 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> For RFC 5322, Dave's Author: and Sender: I-Ds might happen to become 
> RFCs before rfc5322bis.  Can they be considered in that case?  
> Certainly, it won't make sense to publish contrasting specifications, 
> such as, for example, the number of email addresses allowed in a From: 
> field.


Since emailcore is for making small fixes to the core specifications, 
introduction of new functionality would seem to be out of scope.  As 
such, neither of my proposals ought to be relevant to the emailcore effort.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net