Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be

In the paragraph Dave edited, I for some reason find the word "that" as
feeling out of place. I need to read it a few more times.   His other edits
(on the run on sentence) are spot on.

Also, first paragraph:
s/exists according to current IETF procedure/exists according to the
current IETF procedure/

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:17 AM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 7/22/2020 5:07 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> > This working group will conduct that limited review and revision, and
> > publish new versions of these documents at Internet Standard status, per
> > RFC 6410. The limited review is restricted to include corrections and
> > clarifications only, such as verified errata and errata marked as "held
> > for document update", however the WG is not limited to only addressing
> > submitted errata. No new protocol extensions or amendments will be
> > considered for inclusion into 5321bis and 5322bis documents, unless they
> > are already published as RFCs.
>
>
> Possible refinement to the wording of this paragraph:
>
> This working group will conduct that limited review and revision, and
> will publish new versions of these documents at Internet Standard
> status, per RFC 6410. The limited review is restricted to corrections
> and clarifications only. In addition to processing existing, verified
> errata and errata marked as "held for document update", the WG may
> address newly-offered errata.  However, no new protocol extensions or
> amendments will be considered for inclusion into 5321bis and 5322bis
> documents, unless they are already published as RFCs.
>
>
> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-smtp mailing list
> ietf-smtp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
>