Re: [ietf-smtp] ALPN

Claus Assmann <ietf-smtp@esmtp.org> Thu, 29 July 2021 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-smtp@esmtp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2D63A0C4D for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyy8IP7_k2RX for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kiel.esmtp.org (kiel.esmtp.org [195.244.235.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C30A3A0BFC for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kiel.esmtp.org (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by kiel.esmtp.org (MeTA1-1.1.Alpha16.0) with ESMTPS (TLS=TLSv1.2, cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, bits=256, verify=OK) id S000000000006598400; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 06:46:32 +0200
Received: (from ca@localhost) by kiel.esmtp.org (8.16.0.41/8.12.10.Beta0/Submit) id 16T4kWTv011954 for ietf-smtp@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 06:46:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 06:46:32 +0200
From: Claus Assmann <ietf-smtp@esmtp.org>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210729044632.GA80094@kiel.esmtp.org>
Reply-To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Mail-Followup-To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <20210728172631.GA24560@kiel.esmtp.org> <20210729030741.0BDDB2548012@ary.qy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210729030741.0BDDB2548012@ary.qy>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/pgUJwi7M3_eV9HirCio2-1OcsZo>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] ALPN
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 04:46:44 -0000

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021, John Levine wrote:

> I have trouble imagining an actual threat, and even more trouble imagning
> one where an ALPN would make any difference.

Isn't this what "ALPACA" is about?
htttps://alpaca-attack.com/

-- 
Address is valid for this mailing list only, please do not reply
to it direcly, but to the list.