Re: [ietf-smtp] Good to see new list, comments about the "purpose"

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84B93A0E22 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWSrUMXkxzfl for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 291593A0E25 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F536EA1 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:48:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:48:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=OI9u0edohpX1Omcd3Aa7lkF6C5xZiRrWB4oe5U7vz kQ=; b=Y6fHJxIVABJpgueN5lkeDdD3p1nPlw57wrmpxqhDNLUu/YujyFZJol0f5 uwfNV8WvoZp8LTTBuXJmj8gIKY2/pYroLg8PkebzZGIlwYPeJpJLg/vHLiJYq+Cz wuKw0xxu7T7p55ISe45AhbNCcDgFHENStY701QHISSEufTG7078E3DV645wSNg6J cv61Psm/SG/hLcJoyEuSKVcPXq5FPFAOW0wFRd3NJIB9inDJiKoRL+jWJvnC934W D4JIV1t4Z347XqUxXLEIWSljk6HNmR/mTjCS/Sbqd+JI+W6CJuOywrsV0uSG/wJj 2smv9FMLw6WFjZo4qYmbUjZd37tYg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:esQhXwpfvHj9Y1x-4mRRqo_4XKz2OPe_IBYaF4KGki5SLupki0fezw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrieeggdduvdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehhfeutdehfe fgfefghfekhefguefgieduueegjeekfeelleeuieffteefueduueenucfkphepuddtkedr vddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:esQhX2qPxTYhKIdPRuokAQD7y3nUlOxS6HmLGguJBrneNx81NUYqWg> <xmx:esQhX1OkD-pF94kGPf5OSJFoDIagDPqGQVEGZ535P9hk5DXWiS4UHw> <xmx:esQhX371snHKfb_D2HEA_v-VEavTNhGJnvRjJcrS0PTWEHGMxIhV9g> <xmx:e8QhX57Otp9cYw671T1L57yuJzdF_R-HyD6akc_Vrqk-ygrlDui5eA>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BCCA23280059 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:48:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <11c583d2-ef3a-e24e-5e32-98c2e6e66d86@linuxmagic.com> <70a175d5-c32b-9096-7203-996475054f48@dcrocker.net>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <6739ac44-8e16-e330-ffca-b2e91b7b2292@network-heretics.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:48:25 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <70a175d5-c32b-9096-7203-996475054f48@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/v51_wPZAgLLVp50Qch_tpwA4SiI>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Good to see new list, comments about the "purpose"
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:48:32 -0000

On 7/29/20 12:19 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:

> It's not that the larger scope isn't worthy, it's that it isn't 
> practical. 

Agree.  There's also a real potential for it to be a Pandora's box.

Keith