IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] New Version Notification for draft-crocker-email-deliveredto-00.txt

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 12 February 2021 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B734B3A10EB for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:48:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z1sw2Qz5LV7L for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:48:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dormouse.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (dormouse.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D90EF3A10E9 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:48:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D33681406; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:48:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nl-srv-smtpout4.hostinger.io (100-96-11-12.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.11.12]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 412D6681410; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:48:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from nl-srv-smtpout4.hostinger.io ([UNAVAILABLE]. [145.14.159.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.11.12 (trex/6.0.2); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:48:31 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Broad-Print: 1474f15c517cd708_1613098111268_4228730480
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1613098111268:1528444932
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1613098111267
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (Authenticated sender: dhc@dcrocker.net) by nl-srv-smtpout4.hostinger.io (smtp.hostinger.com) with ESMTPSA id 9751C31A123B; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:48:24 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1613098108; bh=XWQ6e5w47XA+m3lPJ+CQa7G/5QysK4dhbXYbbfDZj/w=; h=Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ceyEedSj6gSYrXvBx32vBNeUiETiOwsrFI6K6PTCEUz3zqpqew4SJWGNoDsWTtPZ4 kBldXoSoU1+n4M6gFNE3uYyftTz++3OF9Ta4TdSGr8LjUtP0V1g8OADZPxu7vg3aVY FZsnBMFRiwgixE/BPOa5VkXrRiRof2r7sDXyS+wJgIrpGjZ0Qfv2+0+IhwLl3ZUy35 pPI1m/mrD0MS6ta9mf1oWS35i/bc1VSfEv8C1XZrpyuUqUvX2ipP6QoS2HwthSpKQT RjJjNiVdnoB5JeAGlPcfgqg1LlKaoYGJZhzJMtHCyjdV2eO9iPO5USR7TI48TPg5tx xpWTMk/Uyxj8A==
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org, dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <20210204234602.6DB4D6D63596@ary.local> <6D7EBCFD-C4C1-4623-BB95-4F6114A93C3B@episteme.net>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <a6e19810-4fe4-3b2a-8c79-0f9397b77c9f@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 18:48:20 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6D7EBCFD-C4C1-4623-BB95-4F6114A93C3B@episteme.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/xq59HUIW7-F0W39YbxhRWj-uL4I>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] New Version Notification for draft-crocker-email-deliveredto-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:48:35 -0000

On 2/11/2021 4:35 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> Also, does adding the Return-Path: happen before or after adding the 
> Delivered-To:? The spec seems to indicate before, but it doesn't mention 
> Return-Path: at all.


One is specified in 821 & 822, ff.  The other is specified in this new 
draft.  Neither is jointly specified.

I haven't noticed anything in the new draft that even mentions them 
jointly.  Indeed, Received: is only cited in the new draft in the 
Security Considerations section.

If there is anything in it that produced the 'seems to indicate' 
impression, I'd like to know what it is, so I can fix it.  Even if they 
are added by the same process, I would not expect there to be any order 
dependency.


d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email