Re: [ietf-smtp] Proposed Charter for EMAILCORE WG-to-be

[Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]>]

Dave

Correct. Thanks for reading my intentions.  It does work the more times I
read it.

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:32 AM Dave Crocker <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 7/22/2020 5:23 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> > In the paragraph Dave edited, I for some reason find the word "that" as
> > feeling out of place. I need to read it a few more times.
>
> Just to confirm, I assume you mean:
>
>  > This working group will conduct that limited review and revision, ...
>
> I was trying to preserve as much of the original text as I could and
> didn't even think about this.  In context it works, given the paragraph
> that precedes it.  But it certainly isn't essential.  Also, it's worth
> making the paragraph stand on its own.
>
> So, perhaps...
>
>       This working group will conduct a limited review and revision to
> the base email specifications, and will publish new versions of these
> documents at Internet Standard status, per RFC 6410. The limited review
> is restricted to corrections and clarifications only. In addition to
> processing existing, verified errata and errata marked as "held for
> document update", the WG may address newly-offered errata.  However, no
> new protocol extensions or amendments will be considered for inclusion
> into 5321bis and 5322bis documents, unless they are already published as
> RFCs.
>
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>