IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-types] Request for registration of application/gzip and application/zlib

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Thu, 23 February 2012 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AFB11E809C for <ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:45:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h5kJB4Vx0tK0 for <ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:45:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DD911E808E for <ietf-types@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:45:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OCC0JPTW9C000VNW@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf-types@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:45:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OCBX82X8F400ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:45:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <01OCC0JOB34E00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:44:21 -0800
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:33:12 -0800 (PST)" <01OCC0CIB73O00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1202211047280.29127@joyce.lan> <7bv7k75ur1utsvkk8jvdlp47tt8nuab9e6@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <01OC9QB5028200ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <ctrak7l80s1o4313m2h77b5rojji28j055@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <01OCC0CIB73O00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1330037123; bh=BnEuiGOffjM75C+LGuqYPgTn01k48uZ6rbtUSOPdYSA=; h=Cc:Message-id:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:MIME-version: Content-type:References:To; b=ecZOm4uqXFhJh2A6V+zRI2W2zkQux4VZl4y2Bu8+EQIX0MxwukJlyO93DvHZelra5 COWfAXpWNyq2AjRsVKPSFNrIzt8rTJKBQ6TO7ZJbZm55s6tvnel2K/bUjju/IgrZg+ ZNwK5CLoVhE+wDZGUCYYOF4l2BI2H4leCqXq7nEc=
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, ietf-types@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-types] Request for registration of application/gzip and application/zlib
X-BeenThere: ietf-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Media \(MIME\) type review" <ietf-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-types>, <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-types>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-types>, <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:45:21 -0000

> As such, the requirement that security considerations for standards tree
> registration trumps any "but there is a better location" argument that can be
> made, because said better location doesn't actually exist and isn't going to
> exist.

Sorry, this was supposed to read:

  As such, the requirement that security considerations for standards tree
  registrations be as complete as possible trumps any "but there is a better
  location" argument that can be made, because said better location doesn't
  actually exist and isn't going to exist.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email