Re: [ietf-types] Request for review of EmotionML media type: application/emotionml+xml
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Fri, 11 May 2012 01:22 UTC
Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B7121F84CD for <ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.827
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.827 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.717, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MnDKgGwyLbWg for <ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pechora4.lax.icann.org (pechora4.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1C221F84A0 for <ietf-types@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by pechora4.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id q4B1MC86024621 for <ietf-types@iana.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 01:22:33 GMT
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 May 2012 01:22:10 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-223-210-213.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO HIVE) [94.223.210.213] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 11 May 2012 03:22:10 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19P2ecqCWZPPVSkFqvI9OpAogpaBUxt+InFhfEq/9 3HNqoCH3zGwaGB
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 03:22:10 +0200
Message-ID: <gepoq7t4uidcgmaa9fhh44tma06vi3k0bt@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <4FABECC0.4050805@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FABECC0.4050805@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (pechora4.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.74]); Fri, 11 May 2012 01:22:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ietf-types@iana.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, www-multimodal@w3.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-types] Request for review of EmotionML media type: application/emotionml+xml
X-BeenThere: ietf-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Media \(MIME\) type review" <ietf-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-types>, <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-types>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-types>, <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 01:22:35 -0000
* Kazuyuki Ashimura wrote: >W3C has just published a Candidate Recommendation for "Emotion Markup >Language (EmotionML)" at: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-emotionml-20120510/ > >I am sending this request to ask the Ietf-types list for comments on >the Media Type section of the EmotionML specification following the >procedure defined at: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype The procedure requires Working Groups to ask for ietf-types review when making a Last Call announcement. I have not been able to find any such request in the archive. If the Working Group failed to follow the pro- cedure, it would be helpful if you could put that on the record. >MIME media type name: >--------------------- > application This is using an outdated template. The current one is in RFC 4288. In it, some field names are different and some fields are organized in a different manner. >Optional parameters: >-------------------- > charset > > This parameter has identical semantics to the charset parameter >of the application/xml media type as specified in [RFC3023] or its >successor. > >Encoding considerations: >------------------------ > By virtue of EmotionML content being XML, it has the same >considerations when sent as "application/emotionml+xml" as does XML. See >RFC 3023 (or its successor), section 3.2. RFC 3023 has boilerplate for this, but the above seems close enough. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
- Re: [ietf-types] Request for review of EmotionML … Paul Libbrecht
- Re: [ietf-types] Request for review of EmotionML … Bjoern Hoehrmann