Re: [ietf-types] Registration of media typeimage/svg+xml

Chris Lilley <> Wed, 24 November 2010 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6219C28C19E for <>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:15:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.700, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K41YAWEHE46F for <>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:15:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:1::39]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB8C28C172 for <>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:15:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAOMGKu9031566 for <>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:16:40 -0800
Received: from localhost ([]) by with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <>) id 1PLNdM-0006tn-Do; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:16:12 -0500
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:16:12 +0100
From: Chris Lilley <>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.95.6) Home
Organization: W3C
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <>
To: Larry Masinter <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 ( []); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:16:40 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <>, "" <>, Henri Sivonen <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [ietf-types] Registration of media typeimage/svg+xml
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Chris Lilley <>
List-Id: "Media \(MIME\) type review" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:15:43 -0000

On Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 9:14:12 PM, Larry wrote:

LM> Martin, in a couple of places you complained that the SVG registration
LM> template, contained in a W3C document, referred to "this specification",
LM> and said:

LM> # "this specification" doesn't work when the registration template is 
LM> # taken out of the SVG spec. Either say "the SVG specification" or 
LM> # explicitly reference a specific version of the specification.

LM> However, I think it is common practice both in W3C and IETF, that
LM> a registration template embedded within another document can
LM> reasonably say "this specification" to mean the document in which
LM> it is embedded, with the registry itself pointing to an
LM> explicit version of the spec as well as the template within.

Larry, your interjection is timely, as I was just about to edit the registration to address Martin's comment.

Given that we already have

Published specification:

    This media type registration is extracted from Appendix P of the
    SVG 1.1 specification.

I'm tempted to just s/this specification/the published specification/

LM> There are plenty of examples... perhaps those comments don't apply?

LM> (This comment applies to all registries, not just of media types.)

LM> Larry

 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups