Re: amount of time for WG meetings, starting times, unstructured time, etc for Seoul

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 15 September 2016 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4636F12BDA6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4HZmQEU_E3UX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1F6412B6E6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 07:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.121] (50-1-99-230.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u8FEop0K055878 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 07:50:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-99-230.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.230] claimed to be [10.32.60.121]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "IETF discussion list" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: amount of time for WG meetings, starting times, unstructured time, etc for Seoul
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 07:50:51 -0700
Message-ID: <90383C8C-248F-411F-9CC8-A4B979013ABC@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <36E1BF01-61F0-4C37-A4F6-70F36416EB36@ietf.org>
References: <36E1BF01-61F0-4C37-A4F6-70F36416EB36@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-0pdPtX6AOWwp7wUPZXiw93Su2M>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:54:14 -0000

On 15 Sep 2016, at 4:58, IETF Chair wrote:

> Q1. Please confirm that the community wishes that we arrange more 
> unstructured time for work to happen.

Yes, if this does not force cancellation of needed WG meetings. It is OK 
if it forces shortening of some meetings by 30 mins, for example.

> Q2. Would you like to either keep the amount of meeting time from 
> Berlin, or reduce it so that an additional hour(s) can be used for 
> design team meetings and other unofficial interaction?

Reduce by a bit seems OK.

> Q3. Any other feedback? Other suggestions?

The ability to have grab-and-go lunches, either in the venue or within a 
block or so, *greatly* increases the ability to make the 90 minutes of 
lunch be useful work/social time. Even the typically over-priced hotel 
fare is useful if some of us want to eat quickly so that we have an hour 
or even a half-hour of coordination on some work topic, particularly 
something that came up earlier in the week. (This is probably not an 
issue for Seoul, but should be kept in mind for all meetings under this 
topic.)

--Paul Hoffman