IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DFE3A0B22 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YuqpO530B-a3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A323A0C33 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 074FE3tP010799 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:31:58 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=gG/qfMN5v5ndnDXh5mOVfzGGknRHbt08UKPGHgGWZ/Q=; b=VXQKMRPecfIv/YCAORl6ynJaRbI3+Rb09GoLtO8jdr7vAUorbYbYqY+IOO8kjSPS2Gt+ qPSjLp0KrfOkug/5Mj5IYj2p+PZRp8s/ZBdGey7pTUdOLNFU1qwcliyehUNbf6PVba+4 qRWU/WxnQwEKkxqchHEK5VQWdR2F5KD0b/yvn1ijGNQDxXiv1DIMOzxikCjs3mFjN89o osCJUf5JIsviQGIvUj1UjGk1uNHDfXgMQaBhEbqSIC5nskTqksCNcTsVcUzMDo/ZV9Pg lK+OJisPm0FhguX1H2cZApWEZ3w0OxKxtj2eLtbDzblq2Tg+7yvQe0EhUmmjo8ZMQcai 5A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (a72-247-45-34.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.34] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32n6ya8jv8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:31:58 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 074FKdxK030654 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 11:31:57 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.117]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 32n3qxvcu0-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:31:57 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 10:31:56 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 10:31:56 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
CC: "manycouches@ietf.org" <manycouches@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
Thread-Topic: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
Thread-Index: AQHWaiz3/oho8p4EqEOp+1Z18nVPmKkoQ7EA///hfgA=
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:31:56 +0000
Message-ID: <6AC65028-BCCE-47CD-9D48-EF2E3F1F4A40@akamai.com>
References: <3064c634-3958-f5e3-26c2-cdd148a86605@tenghardt.net> <20200804070010.GN92412@kduck.mit.edu> <8c7aaf71-0f36-8f4c-2534-0a44cf4a4a33@cdt.org>
In-Reply-To: <8c7aaf71-0f36-8f4c-2534-0a44cf4a4a33@cdt.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.39.36]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <42B69272A3399F4BBE5BC9BC8734E35A@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-04_04:2020-08-03, 2020-08-04 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=655 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008040116
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-04_04:2020-08-03, 2020-08-04 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=625 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008040116
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-3tkWUG2eXrgONUO742KDsUDhBE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:32:11 -0000

>    Same-- I didn't use Slack during the week, but I would be very 
    interested to know how it went.

IETF to bcc.

Never got a definitive answer; I posted the question last week -- https://app.slack.com/client/T03SESPS0/C03SESPT6

I don't know if Theresa and Richard had specific plans.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email