IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Hum theatre

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Thu, 07 November 2013 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE5E21E80B8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:23:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, WEIRD_PORT=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xRMBkRugpprS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:23:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43D021E80E4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:23:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9239210584 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:23:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aragorn.restena.lu (aragorn.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8::155]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8294910583 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:23:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <527B4E01.9080800@restena.lu>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:23:29 +0100
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Hum theatre
References: <527AF986.4090504@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <527AF986.4090504@dcrocker.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="THID7FMaXEmwFpr1KVWL7TL8gKLc0IaM2"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:23:33 -0000

Hi,

> Here's what I suggest:  A single, simple, conceptual question that
> supplies all of the 'guidance' we can legitimately offer, at this stage:
> 
>      The IETF needs to press for careful attention to privacy
>      concerns in its work, including protection against surveillance.

This is not a question.

Stefan

-- 
Stefan WINTER
Ingenieur de Recherche
Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
de la Recherche
6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg

Tel: +352 424409 1
Fax: +352 422473

PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the
recipient's key is known to me

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email