Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 24 February 2015 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BCE1A8792 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:21:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8WRI-dAKKBAI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:21:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC07A1A878E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:21:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id h11so27270343wiw.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:21:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YVxUYlTxIE1CYMmIc89yHkTlIJrYLgw422OvTHZ38MI=; b=QrqzHKSPbeV03Nlsz/NxDUsnExzExO0QzzZWlRU9jx6eFifkOl/tcXLDV+QNgECeyF hB77M2oQOXMzmk9YWkn+LRmnAHuJ4UNe+Xa8KEwxWvL+zkrngHNogF5YKfHmwaTgQk4z NhIyv8+x+UQGexf6/W5cptQ1gxz2IbALJMiXUr1UtAckepx6qjjpidmdzQdAlaOMx901 HkTwtTnnOKYDCB1RzEx7Nv8aKOD91AuHrXANDrxHjBtNeTtpy8PpQjrLHzSSmlKOIiLX 2q/rcxLg2GqNTqZAmeKrHjqX9g05Y8Fk7tKNio3xAEgf+PRyp8mSHn+G/u9lUdJtQZ8M bpOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkNdXvyRHG/2ckyQ8G+2ytSUTg3mbVIYmioOhd16t5ZFnX2+etcB631JaL4sEwIA7HoeJKZ
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.85.70 with SMTP id f6mr32241561wiz.22.1424802079359; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.158.229 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:21:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54ECBC5E.2030001@dcrocker.net>
References: <20150224170152.6224.60832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DBC7E705-B163-46E8-AC9B-97BDC33E7C68@apple.com> <54ECBC5E.2030001@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:21:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKpmEOFyZ5Mi=6KcsEoLHDVCwFTi5q_0GfK-d5B1X_Hdg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-5kllLjO83z6T6NTTlPz2eaJklM>
Cc: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org Disgust" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:21:23 -0000

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> On 2/24/2015 9:57 AM, Stuart Cheshire wrote:
>> I realize that these things are often not planned a long way in
>> advance, but for future events, as much notice as possible would be
>> helpful.
>>
>> It’s now less than four weeks to the IETF meeting, and many of us
>> have (non-refundable) flights already booked.
>
>
> +1
>
> Very short notice is pretty common for these special activities
> surrounding the IETF.
>
> It would be worth getting some agreement on a reasonable deadline for
> announcing them.  One month ain't it.

Yup, fully agree, one month is not long enough. Whoever[0] is
organizing this could have done better / gotten it organized earlier
--- however, I'm really glad that someone has actually bothered
organizing such a thing. If it turns out to be useful, perhaps it will
be announced earlier in the future. We kvetch about lack of running
code, missing implementations, etc - let's not also kvetch too much
when someone tries to organize something to improve the situation.


W
[0]: Apparently cisco...


>
> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf