IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers

Greg Daley <gdaley@au.logicalis.com> Tue, 17 September 2013 02:14 UTC

Return-Path: <gdaley@au.logicalis.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D6811E8280 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PEoyPfhztajz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.au.logicalis.com (smtp2.au.logicalis.com [203.8.7.133]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D914411E80F2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: None (smtp2.au.logicalis.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of gdaley@au.logicalis.com) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=203.8.7.161; receiver=smtp2.au.logicalis.com; envelope-from="gdaley@au.logicalis.com"; x-sender="gdaley@au.logicalis.com"; x-conformance=spf_only
Received-SPF: None (smtp2.au.logicalis.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@sdcexchht.au.logicalis.com) identity=helo; client-ip=203.8.7.161; receiver=smtp2.au.logicalis.com; envelope-from="gdaley@au.logicalis.com"; x-sender="postmaster@sdcexchht.au.logicalis.com"; x-conformance=spf_only
Received: from unknown (HELO sdcexchht.au.logicalis.com) ([203.8.7.161]) by smtp2.au.logicalis.com with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2013 12:14:34 +1000
Received: from SDCEXCHMS.au.logicalis.com ([10.18.196.50]) by sdcexchht.au.logicalis.com ([fe80::68b7:8880:fefb:f742%12]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:14:33 +1000
From: Greg Daley <gdaley@au.logicalis.com>
To: 'Phillip Hallam-Baker' <hallam@gmail.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: RE: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
Thread-Topic: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
Thread-Index: AQHOsxKTL8okOPJnOkaXYuoN3FCymJnIG6KAgAABL4CAAGElAIAAsmJg
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:14:33 +0000
Message-ID: <72381AF1F18BAE4F890A0813768D992801168385@sdcexchms.au.logicalis.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwi3+CKd79t0=zwNbcc5bART527iuSHLuYx4bHjavTsb7g@mail.gmail.com> <20130916194531.86773.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAMm+LwgGWSvpmenGQc9w0_rYgShp3wxfkBHLbjM-OhhkHt8n3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgGWSvpmenGQc9w0_rYgShp3wxfkBHLbjM-OhhkHt8n3w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-AU
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.196.185]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_72381AF1F18BAE4F890A0813768D992801168385sdcexchmsaulogi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:14:43 -0000

I do have an identical twin brother, and hashing the DNA sequence collides more regularly than either random or MAC-based interface-identifiers in IPv6.

Also, he doesn't have the same opinions.

Greg Daley

From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phillip Hallam-Baker
Sent: Tuesday, 17 September 2013 11:33 AM
To: John Levine
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers



On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com<mailto:johnl@taugh.com>> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>Since this has turned out to be ambiguous, I have decided to instead use a
>SHA-256 hash of my DNA sequence:
>
>9f00a4-9d1379-002a03-007184-905f6f-796534-06f9da-304b11-0f88d7-92192e-98b2
How does your identical twin brother feel about this?

His opinion is identical to my own.


--
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status