IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Tue, 31 March 2020 06:10 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E413A1BEB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SNktIBjTLetg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F5D13A1BEE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FC4A5E970A; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:10:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id clXEI_aS9D6c; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:10:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C042A5E9700; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:10:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 01:10:22 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <DEE8329D-9990-494A-AC78-E9C971255F27@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200331060238.GR18021@localhost>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCzMPGuunYZBCSh90ddY2kKJ_Hqnot0s1jmhNQ7qT0xkg@mail.gmail.com> <20200331060238.GR18021@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-7KWEXDtsYQ6RGUml1RlzI3VS84>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:10:30 -0000

On 31 Mar 2020, at 1:02, Nico Williams wrote:

> A last call *is* a normal period of discussion.  Sure, there would be 
> no
> preceding discussion, but that's OK -- the minimum time is 4 weeks, 
> and
> you've got 28 days + two to spare.

Note that there has already been 2 weeks of "preceding discussion". The 
top of this thread is March 13.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email