Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

Edward Lewis wrote:
> At 10:57 -0500 2/12/10, Stephen Kent wrote:
> 
>> If we look at what the CP developed in the SIDR WG for the RPKI says, the
>> answer is the IESG (going forward, after an initial set of algs are 
>> adopted
>> based on the SIDR WG process). In the IPSEC, TLS, and SMIME contexts, 
>> the WGs
>> themselves have made the decisions, which the IESG then approves by 
>> virtue of
>> the usual standards track RFC approval process. I do not believe that the
>> criteria have been documented uniformly across these WGs.
> 
> What is "CP?"

Certificate Policy: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sidr-cp-08.txt

spt