Re: Community Feedback for London Venue
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Sat, 19 November 2016 18:35 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CDA12007C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:35:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FuNH8mw9MYu0; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (dawn.hardakers.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:187::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CECE12944B; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA34F20A99; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:35:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Community Feedback for London Venue
References: <147921560801.10379.10480392218977308954.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2h978s30f.wl-randy@psg.com>
X-Hashcash: 1:22:161119:randy@psg.com::gUASP2yle5G6Wz3i:00000kOo
X-Hashcash: 1:22:161119:iad@ietf.org::VQ46xbjtwQrzhr4q:000009RVl
X-Hashcash: 1:22:161119:ietf@ietf.org::Uiv6YiiWNph7wW0g:0000buNA
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:35:07 -0800
In-Reply-To: <m2h978s30f.wl-randy@psg.com> (Randy Bush's message of "Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:05:20 +0900")
Message-ID: <0lwpfz48tg.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-JIMU0V_sqN38ItwGGCXC1OF1RQ>
Cc: IETF Administrative Director <iad@ietf.org>, IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:35:10 -0000
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> writes: >> 2. Hotel navigation was confusing. >> >> Better signage and a second time familiarity with the venue by some >> should improve the attendee experience. > > you underestimate the complexity of navigating the hotel. It's one of those places (we've been to a few) that makes only a few days in, certainly. But did you miss a meeting? Were you late to a meeting? For me, it was confusing both times but fairly quickly settled down. If the construction is over, that will truly help. > the humor of the secretariat helped a lot. I'm hoping to add more buttons to my "special" stack and look forward to the next labyrinth rewards. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- Community Feedback for London Venue IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Community Feedback for London Venue Randy Bush
- Re: Community Feedback for London Venue Patrik Fältström
- Re: Community Feedback for London Venue Wes Hardaker
- Re: Community Feedback for London Venue tom p.