IETF Logo Mail Archive

https at ietf.org

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 06 November 2013 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6125811E818C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:35:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id awbUHCLx+Zrr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:35:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f169.google.com (mail-ve0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCD821F9EB0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:34:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c14so3182015vea.28 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:34:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=K6Dl9wn05xzCw9xzFVGJyIl87WdFuc1A8b0E/bDzlxQ=; b=dcIpguX8Z5610IBOFU5NuDBS+5THQYtWZWCxIhEHSJMCIFqn31aebBhi2JVtu54MNy FmXdrcRe8BXAmui2AWsUEQCBpvGz2gNb5dx0IMVTxIl+7ESlFFNb2zlJIT2nXBK80wMm Y4ORG0+4S5a/OEcLs3B1Sa6QvLBJp27gs130t4EjLlZTEaSWOzQXv6SQN5LVJ2GsJ2Vq PxVK9dkyIz6vu12hvhnljVHWvvL1BzOoDGgz4EZ6g2Y4varPYm0Pkt3qZ/SrtlreJxyR opFHNtXsMPmQRqveuMbZ0d2Owk/Cka6RU5IDz9ejlcdui86HOnVuY03K1GEP4LNCVgJK 6X6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnFc+yZ2k1CpFBkwXxs4sOWbvMeEfJdPLgKhGcCn1lgLoCMguKMacQmBy5lxzxFL9a0P2v3
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.33.69 with SMTP id p5mr138308vdi.28.1383698094969; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:34:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.110.134 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:34:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [96.49.81.176]
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:34:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6ivbrk=NXgd4_5Upik+8H0AbHRy3kJnN=8fcK+Bz3pOV9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: https at ietf.org
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3079ba546d6cbf04ea7751cc"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:35:10 -0000

Wouldn’t it be a good idea for everything at *.ietf.org to be served by
HTTPS, and only by HTTPS?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email