IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF network incremental plan

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 04:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AC012988C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:59:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9iRjy_gOjmia for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:59:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE2F12988A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id d2so47073594pfd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:59:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ayMAnQw/zdSVvjRlT+rWuoj1CNIILPfbbeeDMSedtOU=; b=v53TKCdppfveGnsQgOiIJC/CJwVhMhOQ2VyY9nm+c1haKgibLOHbNXX8qw1XvS9mY6 ogg0TowBPTtaWafF2eMDno5bnxVo2Ow++lKqpzWJMptgB1rKwJr1LRFySBasBYJrOs1U xmEGx0cqgfzmgmmZsRyiPdWektbBckJpA0ISIoxuITecOz3q+OSiFn/drc2cjpflN3iy CUOPUQe3Fany696NnMBq82Iq6uzRXpaBSqcsCKv51n+dHRkwVt9nR+/o+nigD/NX0uR2 Fv7np2fFkNcdc9EDXD89p76NTDHXljsf5wC7I3y3thGAaYl+5og4t8PU0wxvWakt6Jw7 lYdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:reply-to:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ayMAnQw/zdSVvjRlT+rWuoj1CNIILPfbbeeDMSedtOU=; b=U4tP4iT+zz4oNOwgrjMijOsiF6A1MSFQB17BZnlMD8igm8hfixrl15zPIHS0WcnjJm htlq1Bbr1S7Nc5qrBKPyLJFq4JQXOT0roeVEagsxyW/WbLGvA0mqssJ7d6Z9XZgZc+wf LAL1n8L1W9tB6cjnb+dieiGIwPbw72JYQQx/eJ3ItmydbUzgY4nAf/VzAFw6cPiewqeU ul6a+YFBkuNUS4E0zHdbNdTiV49gJv3zpShB9Zy4edRF14fR73SHe7Bqfqz4A4MW3HUn qyD3o3Oh3Rns4Cbgw2Vuu995wH5CYzL4Q/8UkS1AYepiKwDEATAlC7UEFCtbAtKnUZOB tJww==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcqRlwrXppD3GwhLWbeDV6MSOUHHg0sS8zqwryJh7hjWR+JgZrVSjuG+1EF9vaqZw==
X-Received: by 10.99.234.21 with SMTP id c21mr3258837pgi.166.1479358753501; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:20b8:2e27:2bcd:4a8e? ([2001:67c:370:128:20b8:2e27:2bcd:4a8e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p79sm1950800pfj.51.2016.11.16.20.59.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:59:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: IETF network incremental plan
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <0C5BCD32-2D2A-42B9-8DEA-A1E1A527A8BB@consulintel.es> <m2zikzq7tg.wl-randy@psg.com> <dbcca137-9fef-723c-8fbd-edb12aff0b46@gmail.com> <04D0964A-B0E7-4F9C-A725-65D9429492E9@virtualized.org> <CAP4=VcjCTxrxhtoaN=fdbUr37zd1j9=aQP2BTgSca3o-rv91Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <b4845eb1-ed01-48c0-1933-267494be480e@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:58:52 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAP4=VcjCTxrxhtoaN=fdbUr37zd1j9=aQP2BTgSca3o-rv91Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-N8K71Evq4T-L20hn1B-rijKKcI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 04:59:16 -0000

On 11/17/2016 1:52 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
> But for others, it will merely be an inconvenience.


Indeed.

Coercive experiments on production services tend to have collateral 
effects that typically are significant and undesirable.

The IETF meeting network is a production service for more than 1000 people.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status