IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RE: DNS

"Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@ameritech.net> Fri, 06 September 2002 06:08 UTC

Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki [10.27.2.29]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA26478; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:08:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id CAA08009 for ietf-outbound.10@loki.ietf.org; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:10:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28]) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA07975 for <ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:06:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id CAA23201 for ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:04:35 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
Received: from mail1-0.chcgil.ameritech.net (mail1-0.chcgil.ameritech.net [206.141.192.68]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23134 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:04:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from repligate ([64.108.202.122]) by mail1-0.chcgil.ameritech.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with SMTP id <20020906060605.SNJU11881.mail1-0.chcgil.ameritech.net@repligate>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 01:06:05 -0500
Message-ID: <03b501c2556b$87966fc0$8c56fea9@repligate>
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@ameritech.net>
To: Christopher Evans <teknopup@BIGVALLEY.NET>, 'Scott W Brim' <swb@employees.org>, ietf@ietf.org, bill@strahm.net
References: <EYVFB2W598FAHDYVB7US9VQEBBWV.3d783f42@www>
Subject: Re: RE: DNS
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 01:06:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Relax, IPv8 is just IPv4 on steroids....

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Evans" <teknopup@BIGVALLEY.NET>
To: "'Scott W Brim'" <swb@employees.org>; <ietf@ietf.org>; <bill@strahm.net>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:38 AM
Subject: Re: RE: DNS


> damn.   I stil try to pass my semester 3 on ipv4 and you all starting to 
> kickstart ipv8?  how am I to keep up?!? 
> 
> ugh.  when are the roll out of ipv6?    why roll out v8 when majority are still 
> on ipv4? ugh.
> 
> --chris
> http://digitalatoll.flnet.org/
> 
> 9/4/02 12:40:56 PM, "Bill Strahm" <bill@strahm.net> wrote:
> 
> >Well to be honest, shouldn't you say A Person is calling IPv8 on this
> >and other lists ???
> >
> >I am not sure of anyone else that is currently talking about IPv8 other
> >than those that have accidently gotten pulled in by the troll.
> >
> >Bill
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-ietf@IETF.ORG [mailto:owner-ietf@IETF.ORG] On Behalf Of
> >Scott W Brim
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:40 PM
> >To: ietf@IETF.ORG
> >Subject: Re: DNS
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 08:19:16PM +0100, Haren Visavadia allegedly wrote:
> >> IPv8 is an authorised IP version assignment
> >> ...
> >>     8       PIP      The P Internet Protocol                 [PXF]
> >
> >Yes, version number 8 was assigned to PIP.  That has nothing to do with
> >what some people are calling IPv8 on this list (and others).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email