IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: .org sale - bidding process

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 18 January 2020 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4681200B4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:24:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EfzidFYVAYVV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D15D120091 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id d15so27967158iog.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:24:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1SVF2/domdlytXZBbzemP4C1LqPsuwBfpEJ/YOJAL7Q=; b=iSTwwuTFd7CxmommMF2lYD/BaS7VGLcz+CelrQYUUkSYEv1AVFcpl970xHLJEI8TzN rVoZVYIGjHYTFv1A58af43qfspez7ZUraoWpNrTM58+d6OT0t+rZY0jpe/gBHPV89Xe4 Y3ozNHLKaAB/3E3bc4+QxB3jehvtqbicATTeCiU5mxg5J7TNj5ITT3cnw4Dc5nYFFfU0 sjyz72HoajCtx+rFaqhvvRf3LJGNN8qeLJ6e7YVC9gsX11EMd3f4NuQMRmjUiZp3hPpK QkwnuljWG52dTyD8IdPLN+clj6IaASS7FwBPlt909he26iLRb8S0s9x5zUnqlVTzTK9v CGPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1SVF2/domdlytXZBbzemP4C1LqPsuwBfpEJ/YOJAL7Q=; b=jvLFhJ60IP5umZQ5SAH2ri8M+5AzBqRgGyoq4euz/W3g7LzXLbTQ/Pdj6EKwyW/utR CqShbj61zYqcDKtGDU2DL7akWVBhsuBGTWRDAKOcUAHvr3CITvIyiM9d7KyQ4xkwy1XY pPuNEx908hsY3kNxswwyuANOLaeTjr63FNnK1FaO6TkDSMGV7Ybgj+L3TYq6w+Co3UBT M7QmlFwlQ2ylV2Fg2NtNOESi55box9g96Pr9h/30Rc00ZfLRaN80/QIQa/zLOxgibKL/ LWU40+VrGxYAeCajYzcQCEfBteocsm8xxwk3q8zQg1o0P+khGPe3M8ui+/An8jEL6/Wg U0XQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXkWriCYv36WkKh6m47lZ4lAEgcgv3iE0FaAK9nyWmkcwnDdIhE 2b6F6nffVRgQ6KP7RddnPGCui36PNTxgnx9po9k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz3Zp6Rg0pBkfX+0DYzKWgF1T6i8p8a33kjfWj2Woi2uGSf5qYaR1UKQG2h7uOduiVjFvh56KgZKZjCc/+ZHhc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:21a:: with SMTP id e26mr6123384jaq.53.1579307056380; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:24:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SzL7NcnEQ7J7C+zxF28faHUzHOPQuhtuNCN6z9Z1M9Hvg@mail.gmail.com> <20200117174531.tzvaerhqtkwzkxhj@mx4.yitter.info> <m2muallp1e.wl-randy@psg.com> <CABcZeBMTm8jyxWyBUn1yYRuuCwgTnj8ME16vOSfU-N2ZbNopyg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMTm8jyxWyBUn1yYRuuCwgTnj8ME16vOSfU-N2ZbNopyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:24:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6SzDH5y-qA5LMUv9Uo6nJhMd7Aw74w4zVATbe5vCSAGkZw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: .org sale - bidding process
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, Andrew Sullivan <sullivan@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000164651059c5f141c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-Q7DrTYE7JeApjwlHzL9ctaNpdg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 00:24:19 -0000

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 2:36 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 2:03 PM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>
>> perhaps "I don't think the IETF list is a good place to discuss the PIR
>> transactio" does not have the best cosmetics for a subject where folk
>> have expressed concern of discussion suppression.
>>
>
> This seems like an argument that really proves too much. Suppose someone
> wanted to discuss the US presidential election on the IETF list and then
> expressed concern over discussion suppression, would that mean it was bad
> optics to suggest that the IETF list wasn't the best place?
>

Maybe a better argument is that 4 members of the ISOC board are appointed
by the IETF. (https://www.internetsociety.org/board-of-trustees/)

A public web page (n.b. not a "discussion") detailing the bidding process
seems like something the IETF might reasonably expect from its board
members.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email